Tools & Wizards About Us
glamour.biz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

329 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

155 ms

glamour.biz screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glamour content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glamour.biz

Visit glamour.biz

Key Findings

We analyzed Glamour.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glamour.biz performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glamour.biz

329 ms

style.css

96 ms

vbr4uqj.js

180 ms

_packed.js

388 ms

p.gif

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Glamour.biz, 8% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Glamour.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 211.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

6.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glamour.biz main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 6.1 MB
  • After minification 6.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glamour images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 104.6 kB

  • Original 174.8 kB
  • After minification 174.6 kB
  • After compression 70.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.6 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glamour.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (31%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

66

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glamour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glamour.biz

glamour.biz

329 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

vbr4uqj.js

vbr4uqj.js

180 ms

_packed.js

_packed.js

388 ms

p.gif

p.gif

122 ms

ga.js

ga.js

11 ms

all.js

all.js

269 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

61 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

87 ms

lang_ru.png

lang_ru.png

114 ms

lang_left.png

lang_left.png

187 ms

lang_en.png

lang_en.png

188 ms

lang_right.png

lang_right.png

195 ms

delim.png

delim.png

195 ms

works.png

works.png

196 ms

works_text.png

works_text.png

309 ms

services.png

services.png

310 ms

services_text.png

services_text.png

310 ms

about.png

about.png

309 ms

about_text.png

about_text.png

310 ms

contacts.png

contacts.png

310 ms

contacts_text.png

contacts_text.png

372 ms

top_logo_bg.png

top_logo_bg.png

372 ms

top_logo.png

top_logo.png

376 ms

spoiler.png

spoiler.png

377 ms

main.png

main.png

481 ms

title.png

title.png

380 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

645 ms

g.png

g.png

466 ms

t.png

t.png

480 ms

f.png

f.png

479 ms

home.png

home.png

483 ms

top.png

top.png

558 ms

map.png

map.png

565 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

7 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

19 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

68 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

48 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

125 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

15 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

14 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

38 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

38 ms

pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

36 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

66 ms

26 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

212 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

418 ms

jot

jot

96 ms

preloader.js

preloader.js

95 ms

like.php

like.php

150 ms

left.png

left.png

377 ms

left_bottom.png

left_bottom.png

574 ms

main.png

main.png

1012 ms

main_in.png

main_in.png

374 ms

menu.png

menu.png

289 ms

right.png

right.png

375 ms

right_bottom.png

right_bottom.png

762 ms

bg.png

bg.png

468 ms

in_menu.png

in_menu.png

656 ms

in_right.png

in_right.png

656 ms

left.png

left.png

935 ms

left_bottom.png

left_bottom.png

950 ms

main.png

main.png

1218 ms

main_in.png

main_in.png

844 ms

menu.png

menu.png

854 ms

right.png

right.png

1223 ms

right_bottom.png

right_bottom.png

1228 ms

in_menu.png

in_menu.png

1028 ms

left.png

left.png

1043 ms

left_bottom.png

left_bottom.png

1196 ms

main.png

main.png

1308 ms

main_in.png

main_in.png

1137 ms

menu.png

menu.png

1231 ms

right.png

right.png

1287 ms

right_bottom.png

right_bottom.png

1404 ms

awards_bg.png

awards_bg.png

1316 ms

bg.png

bg.png

1322 ms

bg1.png

bg1.png

1325 ms

header_bg.png

header_bg.png

1379 ms

in_menu.png

in_menu.png

1401 ms

left.png

left.png

1409 ms

left_bottom.png

left_bottom.png

1510 ms

main.png

main.png

1512 ms

main_in.png

main_in.png

1470 ms

menu.png

menu.png

1494 ms

right.png

right.png

1497 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

547 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

603 ms

right_bottom.png

right_bottom.png

1313 ms

right_in.png

right_in.png

1195 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

1220 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

1224 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

1143 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

1041 ms

Accessibility Review

glamour.biz accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glamour.biz best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

glamour.biz SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glamour.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glamour.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glamour.biz

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glamour. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: