Tools & Wizards About Us
glamourphotography.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

glamourphotography.co

glamourphotography.co

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

575 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

401 ms

glamourphotography.co screenshot

About Website

Visit glamourphotography.co now to see the best up-to-date Glamourphotography content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glamourphotography.co

This domain may be for sale!

Visit glamourphotography.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Glamourphotography.co page load time and found that the first response time was 575 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glamourphotography.co performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glamourphotography.co

575 ms

style.css

109 ms

social_widget.css

76 ms

jetpack.css

143 ms

jquery.js

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Glamourphotography.co, 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) belongs to the original domain Glamourphotography.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 691.2 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

472.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glamourphotography.co main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 574.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 29.0 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 202.6 kB
  • After minification 186.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glamourphotography images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 359.2 kB

  • Original 574.7 kB
  • After minification 573.2 kB
  • After compression 215.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 359.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 294.4 kB

  • Original 355.8 kB
  • After minification 341.7 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glamourphotography.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 294.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (72%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glamourphotography. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glamourphotography.co

glamourphotography.co

575 ms

style.css

style.css

109 ms

social_widget.css

social_widget.css

76 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

143 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

180 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

78 ms

jquery.atd.textarea.js

jquery.atd.textarea.js

174 ms

csshttprequest.js

csshttprequest.js

127 ms

atd.css

atd.css

128 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

script.js

script.js

148 ms

style-weaver.css

style-weaver.css

174 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

31 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

7 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

263 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

4 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

58 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

261 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

5 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

168 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

129 ms

ca-pub-3610177445163354.js

ca-pub-3610177445163354.js

218 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

220 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

140 ms

ir

ir

179 ms

Adorama_Search_125_375px.gif

Adorama_Search_125_375px.gif

175 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

233 ms

spcr.gif

spcr.gif

175 ms

GO_adorama.gif

GO_adorama.gif

197 ms

Adorama_2012_160x600-Same-Day-Shipping.jpg

Adorama_2012_160x600-Same-Day-Shipping.jpg

206 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

236 ms

WM520-Pinup-4X-0681.jpg

WM520-Pinup-4X-0681.jpg

231 ms

fade.png

fade.png

169 ms

Heterochromia_iridum-Eyes-940x198-sml.jpg

Heterochromia_iridum-Eyes-940x198-sml.jpg

299 ms

WM520-Phoenix-Professional-Portrait-Photographer-2-34653-240x300.jpg

WM520-Phoenix-Professional-Portrait-Photographer-2-34653-240x300.jpg

199 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

124 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

123 ms

meetup.png

meetup.png

197 ms

rss.png

rss.png

198 ms

wordpress.png

wordpress.png

165 ms

l4X_9LLx_W0

l4X_9LLx_W0

224 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

112 ms

services.css

services.css

128 ms

g.gif

g.gif

124 ms

ads

ads

310 ms

osd.js

osd.js

41 ms

ads

ads

271 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

23 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

38 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

44 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

42 ms

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

30 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

78 ms

s_0RpjALK5fB_914673532.html

s_0RpjALK5fB_914673532.html

66 ms

2143174332636389539

2143174332636389539

67 ms

abg.js

abg.js

73 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

94 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

47 ms

cl

cl

76 ms

creative_add_on.js

creative_add_on.js

164 ms

s

s

40 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

48 ms

html_inpage_rendering_lib_200_124.js

html_inpage_rendering_lib_200_124.js

59 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

5 ms

surly.js

surly.js

22 ms

ba.html

ba.html

3 ms

4.gif

4.gif

10 ms

2532.js

2532.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

glamourphotography.co accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glamourphotography.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

glamourphotography.co SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glamourphotography.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Glamourphotography.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glamourphotography.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glamourphotography. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: