6.8 sec in total
1 sec
4 sec
1.7 sec
Visit glamur.info now to see the best up-to-date Glamur content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glamur.info
Сауна на Русанівці "Гламур" у Києві на Лівобережній - це сауна з чудовим інтер'єром, SPA Басейн, послуги масажиста, бар, номери люкс і напівлюкс.
Visit glamur.infoWe analyzed Glamur.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
glamur.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value8.5 s
17/100
10%
Value2,410 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.213
58/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
1040 ms
138 ms
100 ms
189 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Glamur.info, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Glamur.info.
Page size can be reduced by 151.0 kB (16%)
946.0 kB
795.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Glamur.info main page is 946.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 316.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glamur images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 64.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glamur.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (68%)
84
27
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glamur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glamur.info
1040 ms
js
138 ms
watch.js
100 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
189 ms
style.min.css
252 ms
styles.css
261 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
243 ms
animations.min.css
234 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
258 ms
frontend.min.css
235 ms
post-8367.css
314 ms
font-awesome.min.css
315 ms
global.css
307 ms
post-5743.css
302 ms
main.min.css
536 ms
font-awesome.min.css
303 ms
fontello.css
384 ms
main-138b31139f.css
385 ms
custom-138b31139f.css
581 ms
media-138b31139f.css
399 ms
style.css
401 ms
css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
580 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
464 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
474 ms
icomoon.css
459 ms
slick.css
733 ms
lae-frontend.css
737 ms
slick-custom.css
736 ms
carousel.css
804 ms
animate.css
815 ms
services.css
814 ms
heading.css
815 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
816 ms
index.js
818 ms
main.min.js
823 ms
wp-embed.min.js
817 ms
slick.min.js
818 ms
lae-frontend.min.js
819 ms
lae-carousel-helper.min.js
812 ms
conversion_async.js
143 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
626 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
609 ms
waypoints.min.js
620 ms
core.min.js
610 ms
swiper.min.js
616 ms
share-link.min.js
615 ms
dialog.min.js
678 ms
42 ms
frontend.min.js
634 ms
carousel.min.js
634 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
632 ms
services.min.js
691 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
690 ms
35 ms
bg.jpg
703 ms
bg-title.jpg
624 ms
photo-solyariy-300x206.jpg
625 ms
photo-sauna-4867-300x200.jpg
624 ms
photo-011-300x206.jpg
626 ms
photo-sauna-4871-300x200.jpg
625 ms
photo-sauna-4874-300x200.jpg
627 ms
photo-sauna-300x206.jpg
627 ms
anons-page-article-04-300x243.jpg
623 ms
photo-sauna-4892-300x200.jpg
624 ms
photo-sauna-4904-200x300.jpg
624 ms
sauna-e1552737462980.png
740 ms
solarium-e1552737388428.png
739 ms
massage-e1552737303824.png
738 ms
jacuzzi-e1552737020607.png
737 ms
photo_2021-09-15-05.08.52-150x150.jpeg
735 ms
photo_2021-09-15-05.08.24-150x150.jpeg
734 ms
photo_2021-09-15-05.07.20-150x150.jpeg
738 ms
photo_2021-09-15-05.05.44-150x150.jpeg
736 ms
photo_2021-09-15-05.06.05-150x150.jpeg
735 ms
photo_2021-09-15-04.51.47-150x150.jpeg
734 ms
title-bg-lux-02.jpeg
641 ms
maps
545 ms
embed
567 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
170 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
268 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
95 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
99 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
100 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
99 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
135 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
179 ms
js
684 ms
logo-glamur-3d.png
575 ms
glamur.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
glamur.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glamur.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glamur.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glamur.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glamur. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: