Tools & Wizards About Us
glassapeel.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

glassapeel.net

Glass Apeel Utilizing hybrid micro-gel suction cupped technology

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

573 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

401 ms

glassapeel.net screenshot

About Website

Visit glassapeel.net now to see the best up-to-date Glass Apeel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glassapeel.net

New micro suction technology that adheres to glass and metal surfaces. Choose from 3 versions of GlassApeel: Block-Out White, Clear and Frosted

Visit glassapeel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Glassapeel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 573 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glassapeel.net performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.glassapeel.net

573 ms

analytics.js

30 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

51 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

93 ms

style.css

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Glassapeel.net, 42% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) belongs to the original domain Glassapeel.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.4 kB (1%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glassapeel.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 268 B

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glass Apeel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 145.9 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB
  • After compression 138.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 923 B

  • Original 88.8 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 87.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glassapeel.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glass Apeel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.glassapeel.net

www.glassapeel.net

573 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

51 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

93 ms

style.css

style.css

97 ms

css

css

39 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

136 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

93 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

137 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

97 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

139 ms

et-core-unified-17290132557908.min.css

et-core-unified-17290132557908.min.css

139 ms

css

css

59 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

170 ms

common.js

common.js

137 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

155 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

5 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

js

js

78 ms

style.css

style.css

105 ms

4fdc02bea421f980ab87432e5e500eb6.gif

4fdc02bea421f980ab87432e5e500eb6.gif

87 ms

BlackLines.jpg

BlackLines.jpg

104 ms

GlassApeel-Logo_Trademark-01.png

GlassApeel-Logo_Trademark-01.png

149 ms

gahruss2.gif

gahruss2.gif

193 ms

glass-adheresecondary-1024x640.jpg

glass-adheresecondary-1024x640.jpg

103 ms

hall.png

hall.png

149 ms

dentist.png

dentist.png

169 ms

GlassApeel_White_Wordpress_RIP-01.jpg

GlassApeel_White_Wordpress_RIP-01.jpg

219 ms

GlassApeel_Clear_Wordpress_RIP-01.jpg

GlassApeel_Clear_Wordpress_RIP-01.jpg

238 ms

frosted-1.jpg

frosted-1.jpg

194 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

21 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

28 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

34 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

44 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

43 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

43 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

39 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

44 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

44 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

53 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

53 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

54 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

53 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

55 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

54 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

55 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

57 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

116 ms

Accessibility Review

glassapeel.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glassapeel.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

glassapeel.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glassapeel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glassapeel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glassapeel.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glass Apeel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: