6.5 sec in total
2.7 sec
3.2 sec
637 ms
Welcome to glassaqua.com homepage info - get ready to check Glass Aqua best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about glassaqua.com
Let Nature Unfold
Visit glassaqua.comWe analyzed Glassaqua.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
glassaqua.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value17.9 s
3/100
10%
2685 ms
14 ms
51 ms
42 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Glassaqua.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Glassaqua.com.
Page size can be reduced by 316.1 kB (35%)
903.5 kB
587.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Glassaqua.com main page is 903.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 243.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 177.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glass Aqua images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 59.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glassaqua.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 88 (92%)
96
8
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glass Aqua. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 50 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glassaqua.com
2685 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
canvas.css
51 ms
powerkit.css
42 ms
style.min.css
66 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
49 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
53 ms
block.css
62 ms
block.css
75 ms
block.css
75 ms
block.css
76 ms
block.css
88 ms
block-section.css
92 ms
block-row.css
91 ms
block-posts.css
90 ms
block-justified-gallery.css
93 ms
block-slider-gallery.css
106 ms
block-posts-sidebar.css
109 ms
advanced-popups-public.css
108 ms
block.css
109 ms
block.css
113 ms
block.css
128 ms
block.css
128 ms
block.css
128 ms
block.css
134 ms
public-powerkit-author-box.css
132 ms
public-powerkit-basic-elements.css
172 ms
public-powerkit-coming-soon.css
171 ms
public-powerkit-content-formatting.css
176 ms
public-powerkit-contributors.css
175 ms
public-powerkit-facebook.css
173 ms
public-powerkit-featured-categories.css
177 ms
public-powerkit-inline-posts.css
178 ms
public-powerkit-instagram.css
178 ms
public-powerkit-justified-gallery.css
185 ms
public-powerkit-lazyload.css
187 ms
glightbox.min.css
184 ms
collect
44 ms
collect
36 ms
public-powerkit-lightbox.css
153 ms
public-powerkit-opt-in-forms.css
147 ms
public-powerkit-pinterest.css
145 ms
public-powerkit-scroll-to-top.css
159 ms
public-powerkit-share-buttons.css
156 ms
public-powerkit-slider-gallery.css
140 ms
js
76 ms
public-powerkit-social-links.css
146 ms
public-powerkit-twitter.css
137 ms
public-powerkit-widget-about.css
140 ms
settings.css
145 ms
style-frontend-jquery.1.0.0.css
140 ms
style.css
179 ms
style.css
148 ms
glassaqua.com
246 ms
jetpack.css
143 ms
frontend.min.js
147 ms
jquery.min.js
157 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
150 ms
advanced-popups-public.js
164 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
165 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
166 ms
public-block-alert.js
116 ms
public-block-collapsibles.js
119 ms
public-block-tabs.js
118 ms
pinit.js
17 ms
e-202436.js
23 ms
colcade.js
135 ms
public-block-posts.js
134 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
137 ms
public-block-justified-gallery.js
138 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
138 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
151 ms
public-block-slider-gallery.js
149 ms
index.js
334 ms
index.js
388 ms
public-powerkit-basic-elements.js
206 ms
public-powerkit-justified-gallery.js
205 ms
lazysizes.config.js
205 ms
lazysizes.min.js
205 ms
glightbox.min.js
212 ms
public-powerkit-lightbox.js
212 ms
public-powerkit-opt-in-forms.js
197 ms
public-powerkit-pin-it.js
197 ms
public-powerkit-scroll-to-top.js
198 ms
public-powerkit-share-buttons.js
195 ms
public-powerkit-slider-gallery.js
192 ms
front-end-jquery.1.0.0.js
228 ms
scripts.js
219 ms
script.min.js
217 ms
GlassAqua_retinalogo.png
54 ms
sdk.js
15 ms
icons.ttf
22 ms
powerkit-icons.woff
22 ms
sdk.js
6 ms
102 ms
powerkit-icons.woff
29 ms
DSC06461.jpg
50 ms
DSC06059-1-scaled.jpg
50 ms
iframe_api
57 ms
pinit_main.js
39 ms
glassaqua.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
glassaqua.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
glassaqua.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glassaqua.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glassaqua.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glassaqua.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glass Aqua. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: