Tools & Wizards About Us
glasshouzz.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

glasshouzz.com

Glass Houzz Media - Real Estate Photography

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

glasshouzz.com screenshot

About Website

Visit glasshouzz.com now to see the best up-to-date Glass Houzz content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glasshouzz.com

Glass Houzz Media

Visit glasshouzz.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glasshouzz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glasshouzz.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.647

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glasshouzz.com

48 ms

glasshouzz.com

426 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

17 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

classic-themes.min.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Glasshouzz.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) belongs to the original domain Glasshouzz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 208.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glasshouzz.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 77.9 kB

  • Original 96.4 kB
  • After minification 91.6 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 113.4 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glass Houzz images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 378.1 kB
  • After minification 378.1 kB
  • After compression 372.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 146.5 kB
  • After minification 146.5 kB
  • After compression 134.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glasshouzz.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (75%)

Requests Now

96

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glass Houzz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glasshouzz.com

glasshouzz.com

48 ms

glasshouzz.com

glasshouzz.com

426 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

17 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

43 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

30 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

26 ms

styles.css

styles.css

133 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

bootstrap-min.css

bootstrap-min.css

30 ms

owl-carousel-min.css

owl-carousel-min.css

39 ms

owl-theme-default-min.css

owl-theme-default-min.css

39 ms

animate-min.css

animate-min.css

45 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

43 ms

helper.css

helper.css

52 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

51 ms

YouTubePopUp.css

YouTubePopUp.css

53 ms

fontawesome-pro.css

fontawesome-pro.css

55 ms

map.css

map.css

130 ms

bauen-main-style.css

bauen-main-style.css

63 ms

preloader-style.css

preloader-style.css

63 ms

scrollbar-style.css

scrollbar-style.css

69 ms

logo-img-style.css

logo-img-style.css

69 ms

css

css

53 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

79 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

173 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

103 ms

post-306.css

post-306.css

81 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

91 ms

global.css

global.css

96 ms

post-227.css

post-227.css

104 ms

css

css

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

113 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

116 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

106 ms

style-fullscreen-multipage-light.css

style-fullscreen-multipage-light.css

118 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

124 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

132 ms

index.js

index.js

132 ms

index.js

index.js

144 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

391 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

131 ms

modernizr-min.js

modernizr-min.js

123 ms

pace.js

pace.js

123 ms

bauen-preloader-1.js

bauen-preloader-1.js

131 ms

popper-min.js

popper-min.js

129 ms

bootstrap-min.js

bootstrap-min.js

336 ms

scrollIt-min.js

scrollIt-min.js

305 ms

jquery-waypoints-min.js

jquery-waypoints-min.js

131 ms

owl-carousel-min.js

owl-carousel-min.js

299 ms

jquery-stellar-min.js

jquery-stellar-min.js

297 ms

jquery-magnific-popup.js

jquery-magnific-popup.js

295 ms

YouTubePopUp.js

YouTubePopUp.js

294 ms

bauen-is-mobile.js

bauen-is-mobile.js

292 ms

menu-close.js

menu-close.js

286 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

280 ms

scrollto-script.js

scrollto-script.js

279 ms

custom-full.js

custom-full.js

305 ms

elementor-portfolio-carousel.js

elementor-portfolio-carousel.js

305 ms

elementor-testimonials-carousel.js

elementor-testimonials-carousel.js

292 ms

elementor-clients-carousel.js

elementor-clients-carousel.js

292 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

304 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

339 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

340 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

331 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

328 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

323 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

326 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

367 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

362 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

315 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

320 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

345 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

345 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

401 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

341 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

362 ms

797192659

797192659

383 ms

GH-Dark-Trans-340x140-1.png

GH-Dark-Trans-340x140-1.png

261 ms

Living.jpg

Living.jpg

262 ms

REPhoto.jpg

REPhoto.jpg

264 ms

icon-1.png

icon-1.png

260 ms

TWPhoto.jpg

TWPhoto.jpg

184 ms

icon-4.png

icon-4.png

172 ms

VSPhoto1.jpg

VSPhoto1.jpg

182 ms

icon-2.png

icon-2.png

266 ms

Aerial.jpg

Aerial.jpg

182 ms

icon-5.png

icon-5.png

182 ms

3D_1.jpg

3D_1.jpg

273 ms

icon-3.png

icon-3.png

184 ms

ObjectRemoval.jpg

ObjectRemoval.jpg

295 ms

ahcfv8qz1zt6hCC5G4F_P4ASlUuYoA.woff

ahcfv8qz1zt6hCC5G4F_P4ASlUuYoA.woff

91 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

92 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff

119 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

129 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYw.woff

130 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

130 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

129 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

264 ms

icon-6.png

icon-6.png

168 ms

Bath2.jpg

Bath2.jpg

210 ms

quot.png

quot.png

209 ms

203is1efsr-copy.jpg

203is1efsr-copy.jpg

189 ms

albright-photo-1-copy.jpg

albright-photo-1-copy.jpg

190 ms

1546967821703.jpeg

1546967821703.jpeg

284 ms

Tina2.jpg

Tina2.jpg

197 ms

GreenBlock.png

GreenBlock.png

166 ms

Accessibility Review

glasshouzz.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glasshouzz.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glasshouzz.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glasshouzz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glasshouzz.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glasshouzz.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glass Houzz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: