Tools & Wizards About Us
glasspolish.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

glasspolish.eu

GLASS POLISH

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

368 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

709 ms

glasspolish.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit glasspolish.eu now to see the best up-to-date GLASS POLISH content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glasspolish.eu

GLASS POLISH

Visit glasspolish.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Glasspolish.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glasspolish.eu performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glasspolish.eu

368 ms

www.glasspolish.com

90 ms

www.glasspolish.com

226 ms

main.9ec7c63edf9f5e41c17c8e152b2b584c.css

65 ms

dynamic.dc8ad4bdcaab43487c4ef131649862c5.css

220 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Glasspolish.eu, 74% (29 requests) were made to Glasspolish.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Glasspolish.shop. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) relates to the external source Glasspolish.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glasspolish.eu main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 32.5 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GLASS POLISH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 187.3 kB
  • After minification 187.3 kB
  • After compression 181.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 964 B

  • Original 75.6 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB
  • After compression 74.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glasspolish.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GLASS POLISH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glasspolish.eu

glasspolish.eu

368 ms

www.glasspolish.com

www.glasspolish.com

90 ms

www.glasspolish.com

www.glasspolish.com

226 ms

main.9ec7c63edf9f5e41c17c8e152b2b584c.css

main.9ec7c63edf9f5e41c17c8e152b2b584c.css

65 ms

dynamic.dc8ad4bdcaab43487c4ef131649862c5.css

dynamic.dc8ad4bdcaab43487c4ef131649862c5.css

220 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

222 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

227 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

224 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

222 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

222 ms

libs.min.js

libs.min.js

223 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

224 ms

formbuilderpro.js

formbuilderpro.js

223 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

225 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

235 ms

moment-with-locales.min.js

moment-with-locales.min.js

495 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

225 ms

formbuilderpro.css

formbuilderpro.css

232 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

228 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

228 ms

js

js

142 ms

js

js

152 ms

glass-polish-logo-2003-est.png

glass-polish-logo-2003-est.png

355 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

233 ms

glass-polish-services-banner-home-2.jpg

glass-polish-services-banner-home-2.jpg

279 ms

glass-polish-products-banner-home-page-dark-tint.jpg

glass-polish-products-banner-home-page-dark-tint.jpg

276 ms

glass-polish-training-banner-new-home.jpg

glass-polish-training-banner-new-home.jpg

276 ms

glass-polish-videos-banner-home-new.jpg

glass-polish-videos-banner-home-new.jpg

174 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

213 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

200 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

44 ms

icon-globe.png

icon-globe.png

89 ms

uk-50.png

uk-50.png

383 ms

glass-polish-bottom-banner.jpg

glass-polish-bottom-banner.jpg

147 ms

usa-50.png

usa-50.png

368 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

ie-50.png

ie-50.png

201 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

37 ms

Accessibility Review

glasspolish.eu accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glasspolish.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

glasspolish.eu SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glasspolish.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glasspolish.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glasspolish.eu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GLASS POLISH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: