1.4 sec in total
105 ms
930 ms
364 ms
Welcome to glide.org homepage info - get ready to check GLIDE best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about glide.org
Visit glide.orgWe analyzed Glide.org page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
glide.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value22.2 s
0/100
25%
Value32.4 s
0/100
10%
Value18,470 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.374
28/100
15%
Value40.8 s
0/100
10%
105 ms
37 ms
29 ms
36 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Glide.org, 18% (16 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) belongs to the original domain Glide.org.
Page size can be reduced by 974.9 kB (20%)
4.9 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Glide.org main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 423.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GLIDE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 425.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 425.0 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glide.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (35%)
89
58
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GLIDE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glide.org
105 ms
stylesheet0.635901129583200000.css
37 ms
stylesheet29.635163493028930000.css
29 ms
IE8Menu.css
36 ms
WebResource.axd
34 ms
BBAPI-min.js
34 ms
Bbnccore-min.js
59 ms
jquery.min.js
48 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
54 ms
jquery.validate.js
48 ms
additional-methods.js
46 ms
jquery.maskedinput-1.1.4.js
52 ms
SlideShow.js
47 ms
ScriptResource.axd
96 ms
ScriptResource.axd
53 ms
webkit.js
95 ms
2012_Homepage_Boy_01.jpg
155 ms
view.image
104 ms
2012_Homepage_Man_01.jpg
153 ms
HP_GLIDE_ANNOUNCES.jpg
104 ms
Button.png
103 ms
REAL_TALK_190X190.jpg
106 ms
Podcast.jpg
107 ms
SocialInnovation_2012_01.jpg
104 ms
view.image
103 ms
view.image
104 ms
view.image
105 ms
view.image
106 ms
view.image
105 ms
view.image
105 ms
view.image
106 ms
view.image
107 ms
view.image
108 ms
2012_Homepage_Couple_01.jpg
108 ms
2012_Homepage_Girl_01.jpg
109 ms
2012_Homepage_Man_01.jpg
272 ms
2012_Homepage_Woman.jpg
151 ms
2012_Homepage_Woman_01.jpg
152 ms
Homepage_03.png
149 ms
Homepage_04.png
151 ms
Homepage_05.png
202 ms
Homepage_Girl_01.jpg
216 ms
Homepage_Women_02.jpg
185 ms
Luciano.jpg
186 ms
Abelino.jpg
216 ms
RamonandYolanda.jpg
253 ms
Blog2012.jpg
216 ms
widgets.js
38 ms
ga.js
36 ms
view.image
686 ms
view.image
52 ms
view.image
177 ms
view.image
51 ms
view.image
52 ms
2012_Homepage_Couple_01.jpg
120 ms
2012_Homepage_Boy_01.jpg
156 ms
2012_Homepage_Woman.jpg
602 ms
2012_Homepage_Woman_01.jpg
120 ms
2012_Homepage_Girl_01.jpg
157 ms
93210045
111 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
35 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
syndication
134 ms
248144907657674753
228 ms
player.js
89 ms
player.css
75 ms
ga.js
90 ms
vuid.min.js
88 ms
proxy.html
35 ms
473441086.jpg
74 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
4 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
5 ms
r1Dq3bUh_normal.jpg
42 ms
ls_Q_color_RGB_Md_normal.jpg
41 ms
voices_avatar_160x160_normal.png
37 ms
179eb2a1791f44dd776e231d1ad0685f_normal.png
37 ms
A6jnqRqs_normal.jpg
39 ms
Theon_Johnson_III_normal.jpg
39 ms
zCe11XcN_normal.jpg
40 ms
FUToW6hA_normal.jpg
40 ms
CcGbtWgUYAAkKY2.jpg:small
45 ms
CcY5z4AWwAALw0v.jpg
46 ms
CcWzW-qWoAAdCQ0.jpg
45 ms
CcZfkd9UkAAg6he.jpg:large
42 ms
CcYxgOPUAAEBYx9.jpg
45 ms
CcZk5F7UYAAjcs3.jpg
45 ms
CcUiUq_UEAASofQ.jpg
47 ms
CcVxuaTVIAALYUD.jpg
50 ms
jot
28 ms
glide.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
glide.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
glide.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glide.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glide.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glide.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GLIDE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: