Tools & Wizards About Us
glidecam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

glidecam.com

Glidecam Industries, Inc. – World Class Camera Stabilizers

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

759 ms

glidecam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to glidecam.com homepage info - get ready to check Glidecam best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about glidecam.com

Visit glidecam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glidecam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glidecam.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.586

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glidecam.com

42 ms

glidecam.com

1264 ms

bootstrap.css

156 ms

woocommerce.css

152 ms

fontawesome-all.css

144 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Glidecam.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Static.klaviyo.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Glidecam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glidecam.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 709.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 69.9 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 709.5 kB
  • After minification 621.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glidecam needs image optimization as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 460.7 kB
  • After minification 460.7 kB
  • After compression 458.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 87.9 kB
  • After minification 87.9 kB
  • After compression 86.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glidecam.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (56%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glidecam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glidecam.com

glidecam.com

42 ms

glidecam.com

glidecam.com

1264 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

156 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

152 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

144 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

style.css

style.css

142 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

140 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

251 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

259 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

253 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

255 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

260 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

271 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

289 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

379 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

401 ms

w.js

w.js

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

397 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

417 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

395 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

334 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

542 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

542 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

552 ms

js

js

60 ms

js

js

89 ms

klaviyo.js

klaviyo.js

261 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

539 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

529 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

529 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

660 ms

default.js

default.js

650 ms

js

js

70 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

711 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

718 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

582 ms

sbi-scripts.min.js

sbi-scripts.min.js

720 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

g.gif

g.gif

138 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

323 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

420 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

422 ms

tagline.jpg

tagline.jpg

423 ms

logo_white.png

logo_white.png

424 ms

Glidecam_X-20_System.jpg

Glidecam_X-20_System.jpg

494 ms

Glidecam_X-10_Andrea_9159_Final_SM.jpg

Glidecam_X-10_Andrea_9159_Final_SM.jpg

495 ms

XR-PRO-HD-PRO-Web-Banner-without-Flag.jpg

XR-PRO-HD-PRO-Web-Banner-without-Flag.jpg

545 ms

glidecam_devin_graham_signature_series.jpg

glidecam_devin_graham_signature_series.jpg

544 ms

x-10.jpg

x-10.jpg

562 ms

X-30.jpg

X-30.jpg

587 ms

X-45.jpg

X-45.jpg

566 ms

Gold_Sled_01.jpg

Gold_Sled_01.jpg

633 ms

Glidecam-Tyler-Rickenbach-Banner.jpg

Glidecam-Tyler-Rickenbach-Banner.jpg

676 ms

Glidecam-Jack-Mold-Logo-Banner-1.jpg

Glidecam-Jack-Mold-Logo-Banner-1.jpg

706 ms

Glidecam-Marc-Planzer-logo.jpg

Glidecam-Marc-Planzer-logo.jpg

720 ms

643122062.jpg

643122062.jpg

698 ms

636846858.jpg

636846858.jpg

730 ms

692327153.jpg

692327153.jpg

753 ms

591197815.jpg

591197815.jpg

801 ms

VM-Award-2020.jpg

VM-Award-2020.jpg

877 ms

promoviemaker_goty.png

promoviemaker_goty.png

844 ms

outdoor-photographer.jpg

outdoor-photographer.jpg

864 ms

videomaker_best_of_ces.jpg

videomaker_best_of_ces.jpg

824 ms

js

js

60 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

94 ms

fender_analytics.113876fdc67592e7cbfd.js

fender_analytics.113876fdc67592e7cbfd.js

69 ms

static.047f24ade89e4aff54a9.js

static.047f24ade89e4aff54a9.js

72 ms

runtime.33e3f83e662b76791bc6.js

runtime.33e3f83e662b76791bc6.js

52 ms

sharedUtils.685bf6de0e3fbc1fadbc.js

sharedUtils.685bf6de0e3fbc1fadbc.js

62 ms

vendors~signup_forms~post_identification_sync~web_personalization~reviews~atlas.b0930143925bb765e2d3.js

vendors~signup_forms~post_identification_sync~web_personalization~reviews~atlas.b0930143925bb765e2d3.js

65 ms

vendors~signup_forms~onsite-triggering.733ed8744f200f7d4d54.js

vendors~signup_forms~onsite-triggering.733ed8744f200f7d4d54.js

65 ms

vendors~signup_forms.824396622be3ec2234ff.js

vendors~signup_forms.824396622be3ec2234ff.js

67 ms

default~signup_forms~onsite-triggering.968e4cc173bff13b788f.js

default~signup_forms~onsite-triggering.968e4cc173bff13b788f.js

69 ms

signup_forms.3c339f68eee3e750afea.js

signup_forms.3c339f68eee3e750afea.js

66 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

779 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

818 ms

aero.woff

aero.woff

860 ms

email.jpg

email.jpg

928 ms

follow.jpg

follow.jpg

790 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

857 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

845 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

802 ms

js

js

48 ms

page-bg.jpg

page-bg.jpg

747 ms

page-bottombg.jpg

page-bottombg.jpg

808 ms

js

js

84 ms

collect

collect

66 ms

collect

collect

101 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

143 ms

Accessibility Review

glidecam.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

glidecam.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glidecam.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glidecam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glidecam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glidecam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glidecam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: