Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

glidecoat.com

Glidecoat Ceramic Coatings For Marine, Aviation & Automotive Glidecoat

Page Load Speed

95.8 sec in total

First Response

221 ms

Resources Loaded

88.3 sec

Page Rendered

7.2 sec

glidecoat.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glidecoat content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glidecoat.com

Our ceramic coatings can withstand even the harshest conditions. Browse Glidecoat for protection on all types of marine, aviation, and automotive surfaces.

Visit glidecoat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glidecoat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 95.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 5 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

glidecoat.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,580 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.glidecoat.com

221 ms

foundation.css

42 ms

foundation.css

86 ms

app.css

108 ms

style.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 174 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (148 requests) were addressed to the original Glidecoat.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (82.8 sec) relates to the external source Js.usemessages.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (10%)

Content Size

14.2 MB

After Optimization

12.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Glidecoat.com main page is 14.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 13.8 MB
  • After minification 12.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glidecoat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 119.8 kB

  • Original 307.9 kB
  • After minification 307.8 kB
  • After compression 188.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.8 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 97.6 kB
  • After minification 97.6 kB
  • After compression 79.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glidecoat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 112 (71%)

Requests Now

158

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 158 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glidecoat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 48 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

glidecoat.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

glidecoat.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glidecoat.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glidecoat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glidecoat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glidecoat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: