Tools & Wizards About Us
glinty.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

glinty.com

Glinty is Saudi Manufacturer of luminairies and lighting systems

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

125 ms

glinty.com screenshot

About Website

Visit glinty.com now to see the best up-to-date Glinty content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glinty.com

Glinty's vision is To be a pioneer Manufacturer of luminaries and lighting systems, using advanced technologies to deliver product reaches customers satisfaction.

Visit glinty.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glinty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glinty.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glinty.com

1857 ms

2567350079.js

43 ms

font-awesome.min.css

801 ms

css

21 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1318 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Glinty.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Glinty.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 610.6 kB (61%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

394.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glinty.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 537.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 16.6 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 856 B

  • Original 113.0 kB
  • After minification 112.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glinty images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 305.0 kB

  • Original 537.7 kB
  • After minification 535.6 kB
  • After compression 232.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 305.0 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 292.0 kB

  • Original 337.9 kB
  • After minification 295.4 kB
  • After compression 45.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glinty.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 292.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (75%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glinty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glinty.com

glinty.com

1857 ms

2567350079.js

2567350079.js

43 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

801 ms

css

css

21 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1318 ms

extralayers.css

extralayers.css

549 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1085 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

581 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

588 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

831 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1438 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

895 ms

alertify.core.css

alertify.core.css

1097 ms

alertify.default.css

alertify.default.css

1117 ms

style.css

style.css

1481 ms

dev_style.css

dev_style.css

1383 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

1384 ms

jquery-1.11.1.js

jquery-1.11.1.js

1666 ms

jquery.fittext.min.js

jquery.fittext.min.js

1597 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1692 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

2152 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

2308 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1791 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1862 ms

js

js

77 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1934 ms

alertify.min.js

alertify.min.js

1957 ms

infobubble-compiled.js

infobubble-compiled.js

2104 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

2143 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

130 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

2205 ms

dev_script.min.js

dev_script.min.js

1980 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1038 ms

logo_main.png

logo_main.png

764 ms

ibtikar.png

ibtikar.png

765 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

17 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

56 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

17 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

38 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

37 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

37 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

829 ms

socials

socials

949 ms

career

career

995 ms

contact.png

contact.png

986 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1015 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

52 ms

Accessibility Review

glinty.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

glinty.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glinty.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glinty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glinty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glinty.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glinty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: