5.8 sec in total
700 ms
4.6 sec
523 ms
Click here to check amazing GLITTER content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glitter.qa
add description ...
Visit glitter.qaWe analyzed Glitter.qa page load time and found that the first response time was 700 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
glitter.qa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value3,200 ms
2/100
30%
Value2.126
0/100
15%
Value15.9 s
6/100
10%
700 ms
23 ms
36 ms
45 ms
413 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Glitter.qa, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to O.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Glitter.qa.
Page size can be reduced by 641.5 kB (36%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Glitter.qa main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.3 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GLITTER images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glitter.qa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (47%)
83
44
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GLITTER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glitter.qa
700 ms
css
23 ms
css
36 ms
css
45 ms
font-awesome.min.css
413 ms
icon-font-custom.css
477 ms
base.css
255 ms
grid.css
253 ms
elements.css
551 ms
layout.css
505 ms
boxed.css
425 ms
settings.css
692 ms
custom.css
579 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
635 ms
magnific-popup.css
646 ms
animate.min.css
941 ms
YTPlayer.css
724 ms
logo.png
686 ms
slider-1.jpg
902 ms
slide1-p1.png
1247 ms
slide1-p2.png
705 ms
slide1-p3.png
738 ms
slide1-p4.png
767 ms
slide1-p5.png
869 ms
slide1-p6.png
905 ms
slide1-p7.png
946 ms
slide1-p8.png
964 ms
slide1-p9.png
1041 ms
slide1-p10.png
1064 ms
gallery-1-3.png
1075 ms
slide2-p1.png
1190 ms
slide2-p2.png
1130 ms
slide2-p3.png
1373 ms
slide2-p4.png
1290 ms
slide2-p5.png
1289 ms
slide3-p1.png
1558 ms
slide3-p2.png
1624 ms
slide3-p3.png
1426 ms
slide3-p4.png
1462 ms
slide3-p5.png
1443 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
2030 ms
js
20 ms
jquery.viewport.js
1612 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1488 ms
jquery.simpleplaceholder.js
1475 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1520 ms
animate.js
1522 ms
hoverIntent.js
1483 ms
superfish.js
1483 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1844 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1929 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1587 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1475 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1490 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1683 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
1564 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
1534 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
1702 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
1614 ms
waypoints.min.js
1584 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
1585 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1784 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1735 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
1620 ms
twitterfetcher.js
1597 ms
scripts.js
1692 ms
plugins.js
1535 ms
iconfontcustom.woff
2461 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2005 ms
slide3-p6.png
1589 ms
event.png
1595 ms
bulb.png
1514 ms
social.png
1459 ms
intractive.png
1700 ms
audio.png
1700 ms
home_img_1.jpg
2351 ms
logo-footer.png
1540 ms
bg.jpg
1969 ms
arrow.png
1601 ms
440384536610734080
191 ms
loader.gif
431 ms
timer.png
479 ms
prev.png
578 ms
next.png
609 ms
proxy.jpg
350 ms
proxy.jpg
427 ms
proxy.jpg
455 ms
glitter.qa accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
glitter.qa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
glitter.qa SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glitter.qa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glitter.qa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glitter.qa
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GLITTER. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: