Tools & Wizards About Us
gluereview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

gluereview.com

Glue reviews, buyers guides, info & more | Glue Review

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

542 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

gluereview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glue Review content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gluereview.com

Glue Review is a team of glue experts. We offer you detailed glue reviews, buyers' guides and info about all adhesive products.

Visit gluereview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gluereview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gluereview.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gluereview.com

542 ms

gppstub.js

167 ms

eae.min.css

27 ms

v4-shims.min.css

25 ms

all.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Gluereview.com, 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (584 ms) belongs to the original domain Gluereview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.7 kB (31%)

Content Size

518.7 kB

After Optimization

359.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gluereview.com main page is 518.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 236.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 158.3 kB

  • Original 191.2 kB
  • After minification 191.2 kB
  • After compression 33.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 88 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glue Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 963 B

  • Original 236.9 kB
  • After minification 236.9 kB
  • After compression 235.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 361 B

  • Original 89.2 kB
  • After minification 89.2 kB
  • After compression 88.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gluereview.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (94%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glue Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gluereview.com

gluereview.com

542 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

167 ms

eae.min.css

eae.min.css

27 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

25 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

46 ms

vegas.min.css

vegas.min.css

47 ms

widget-areas.min.css

widget-areas.min.css

153 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

87 ms

font-icons.min.css

font-icons.min.css

47 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

59 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

72 ms

post-2401.css

post-2401.css

55 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

55 ms

global.css

global.css

68 ms

post-3725.css

post-3725.css

72 ms

post-3722.css

post-3722.css

79 ms

post-3742.css

post-3742.css

79 ms

css

css

437 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

86 ms

iconHelper.js

iconHelper.js

273 ms

js

js

124 ms

snippet.min.js

snippet.min.js

66 ms

ezvideojscss.css

ezvideojscss.css

113 ms

ezvideojspluginscss.css

ezvideojspluginscss.css

119 ms

ezvideocss.css

ezvideocss.css

120 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

208 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

97 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

201 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

120 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

127 ms

dynamic-visibility.min.css

dynamic-visibility.min.css

130 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

144 ms

dynamic-conditions-public.js

dynamic-conditions-public.js

262 ms

eae.min.js

eae.min.js

265 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

272 ms

promotion.js

promotion.js

318 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

357 ms

animated-main.min.js

animated-main.min.js

565 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

401 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

282 ms

v.js

v.js

198 ms

vegas.min.js

vegas.min.js

408 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

406 ms

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

539 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

330 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

339 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

584 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

523 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

513 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

505 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

503 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

496 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

558 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

493 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

488 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

488 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

483 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

567 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

470 ms

boise.js

boise.js

405 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

406 ms

et.js

et.js

405 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

116 ms

axolotl.js

axolotl.js

170 ms

ezoic.png

ezoic.png

207 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

53 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

95 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

95 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

114 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

111 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

112 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

112 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

114 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

111 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

114 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

114 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

115 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

113 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

119 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

31 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

32 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

28 ms

vista.js

vista.js

28 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

46 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

cropped-cropped-glue_review_logo-1.png

cropped-cropped-glue_review_logo-1.png

136 ms

js

js

74 ms

extendedfeed.js

extendedfeed.js

364 ms

tortoise.js

tortoise.js

26 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

27 ms

drake.js

drake.js

25 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

15 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

29 ms

Accessibility Review

gluereview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gluereview.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gluereview.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gluereview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gluereview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gluereview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glue Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: