6.3 sec in total
455 ms
5.4 sec
437 ms
Visit gm-city.ru now to see the best up-to-date Gm City content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gm-city.ru
Продажа деталей и запчастей
Visit gm-city.ruWe analyzed Gm-city.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 455 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
gm-city.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.5 s
0/100
10%
Value15.9 s
0/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
455 ms
498 ms
812 ms
32 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (116 requests) were addressed to the original Gm-city.ru, 3% (4 requests) were made to Site.yandex.net and 2% (3 requests) were made to Code.jivosite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Gm-city.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 617.4 kB (31%)
2.0 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Gm-city.ru main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gm City images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 517.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 517.3 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gm-city.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (53%)
126
59
The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gm City. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gm-city.ru
455 ms
gm-city.ru
498 ms
www.gm-city.ru
812 ms
css
32 ms
header.min_v5.css
124 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
245 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
363 ms
jquery.bxslider.min_v1.css
364 ms
ptsans.css
364 ms
ptsansnarrow.css
374 ms
bootstrap.min.css
500 ms
grid.min.css
378 ms
main.min_v18.css
727 ms
print.min_v1.css
490 ms
jquery.formstyler.min_v1.css
491 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
991 ms
jquery.ui.js
1242 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
609 ms
react.min_v1.js
739 ms
react-dom.min_v1.js
1243 ms
os.min.js
737 ms
osStorage.min_v5.js
846 ms
error.min_v5.js
850 ms
eventsystem.min_v2.js
852 ms
basket.min_v8.js
967 ms
basket-block_v4.js
970 ms
basket-popup_v2.js
972 ms
basket-btn_v1.js
1089 ms
basket-items_v4.js
1091 ms
order.min_v8.js
1093 ms
order-btn_v2.js
1113 ms
form.min_v3.js
1209 ms
geo_block_new_v2.js
1212 ms
officephonelist_v3.js
1215 ms
init.min_v3.js
1240 ms
geo_popup.min_v1.css
1330 ms
core.min.js
1331 ms
kladr.min.js
1334 ms
slider_main.js
1363 ms
call-me.min_v4.js
1363 ms
detail-vin_v3.js
1246 ms
one-click.min_v3.js
1214 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1215 ms
jQuery.succinct.min.js
1095 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1129 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1121 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.min.js
1116 ms
inputmask.min.js
1212 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
1087 ms
jquery.formstyler.min.js
1113 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
1008 ms
addstyles.min.css
880 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.min.js
962 ms
device.min.js
963 ms
common.min_v11.js
928 ms
search.min_v1.js
925 ms
yandexMetrika.min_v3.js
923 ms
bg.jpg
261 ms
header_top-bg.png
262 ms
chev_logo.png
260 ms
logo.png
261 ms
sprite.png
587 ms
youtube-icon.png
260 ms
whats-up.png
381 ms
vk.png
383 ms
insta.png
379 ms
dropdown.png
379 ms
Chevrolet_Spark_M200.png
382 ms
Chevrolet_Spark_M300.png
499 ms
Chevrolet_Lanos.png
500 ms
Chevlolet_Aveo_T200.png
499 ms
Chevlolet_Aveo_T250.png
506 ms
Chevrolet_Aveo_T255.png
506 ms
Chevrolet_Aveo_T300.png
618 ms
Chevrolet_Lacetti.png
618 ms
daewoo_gentra.png
620 ms
Chevrolet_Cobalt.png
629 ms
volt_1.png
631 ms
volt_2.png
710 ms
Chevrolet_Cruze.png
737 ms
Chevrolet_Rezzo.png
739 ms
Chevrolet_Epica.png
739 ms
Chevrolet_malibu.png
752 ms
Chevrolet_Orlando.png
753 ms
Chevrolet_Captiva_c100.png
833 ms
Chevrolet_Captiva_c140.png
858 ms
Chevrolet_TrailBlazer_II.png
843 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEwA.ttf
203 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKA.ttf
203 ms
ptsans.woff
946 ms
ptsansbold.woff
843 ms
Chevrolet_TrailBlazer_III.png
841 ms
JsHttpRequest.js
850 ms
HGZm0q6aoA
726 ms
watch.js
144 ms
analytics.js
149 ms
all.js
910 ms
Chevrolet_Traverse_II.png
745 ms
chevrolet_tahoe.png
751 ms
nexia.png
752 ms
Caddilac_AST.png
824 ms
Cadillac_CTS_II.png
840 ms
Cadillac_CTS_III.png
842 ms
collect
14 ms
js
94 ms
Cadillac_SRX_I.png
749 ms
Cadillac_SRX_II.png
749 ms
Cadillac_Escalade_III.png
827 ms
Cadillac_Escalade_IV.png
839 ms
Ravon_R2.png
839 ms
Ravon_Nexia_R3.png
753 ms
Ravon_R4.png
754 ms
Ravon_Gentra.png
832 ms
Chevrolet_Equinox.png
834 ms
shev_icon.png
835 ms
studia.png
790 ms
time_3.png
758 ms
gm_bg.jpg
837 ms
nav1.jpg
839 ms
title_1.png
832 ms
labels.png
990 ms
top.png
791 ms
bot_logo.png
842 ms
bx_loader.gif
840 ms
search_txt.png
841 ms
HGZm0q6aoA
414 ms
jquery.min.js
488 ms
HGZm0q6aoA
548 ms
suggest.js
98 ms
opensearch.js
203 ms
punycode.js
94 ms
bundle_ru_RU.js
48 ms
gm-city.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gm-city.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gm-city.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gm-city.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gm-city.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gm-city.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gm City. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: