Tools & Wizards About Us
gmasupply.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

gmasupply.com

Richards Building Services | Building Services Industry

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

710 ms

gmasupply.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gmasupply.com now to see the best up-to-date Gmasupply content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gmasupply.com

Industry veterans well experienced in the Building Services Industry servicing the North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia markets.

Visit gmasupply.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gmasupply.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gmasupply.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gmasupply.com

33 ms

richards-services.com

216 ms

formidableforms.css

88 ms

style.min.css

215 ms

theme.min.css

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gmasupply.com, 64% (43 requests) were made to Richards-services.com and 21% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (707 ms) relates to the external source Richards-services.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gmasupply.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 61.7 kB

  • Original 74.4 kB
  • After minification 71.8 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gmasupply images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (80%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gmasupply. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gmasupply.com

gmasupply.com

33 ms

richards-services.com

richards-services.com

216 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

88 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

215 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

216 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

176 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

183 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

138 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

184 ms

post-2823.css

post-2823.css

181 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

272 ms

global.css

global.css

267 ms

post-2821.css

post-2821.css

228 ms

post-2862.css

post-2862.css

250 ms

post-3308.css

post-3308.css

293 ms

css

css

44 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

294 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

304 ms

js

js

101 ms

js

js

214 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

474 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

495 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

474 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

494 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

474 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

499 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

501 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

494 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

494 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

628 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

626 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

618 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

617 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

618 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

618 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

685 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

683 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

707 ms

js

js

173 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

196 ms

js

js

244 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

212 ms

logo.png

logo.png

334 ms

iStock-157284152-1-scaled.jpg

iStock-157284152-1-scaled.jpg

373 ms

dot.png

dot.png

333 ms

team-1024x571.jpg

team-1024x571.jpg

391 ms

allura-siding-800x550-feature.jpg

allura-siding-800x550-feature.jpg

445 ms

921D73B5-1716-4321-AC16-FF168AA01F03.jpg

921D73B5-1716-4321-AC16-FF168AA01F03.jpg

442 ms

construction-employees.jpg

construction-employees.jpg

393 ms

app.js

app.js

154 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

78 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

77 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

97 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

135 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

138 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

138 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff

139 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf8.woff

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf8.woff

136 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf8.woff

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf8.woff

135 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf8.woff

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf8.woff

136 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

342 ms

u-4m0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eRZOf-Q.woff

u-4m0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eRZOf-Q.woff

139 ms

u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7lXff4jvo.woff

u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7lXff4jvo.woff

138 ms

u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR71Wvf4jvo.woff

u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR71Wvf4jvo.woff

140 ms

u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7NWPf4jvo.woff

u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7NWPf4jvo.woff

140 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

355 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

Accessibility Review

gmasupply.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gmasupply.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gmasupply.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gmasupply.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gmasupply.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gmasupply.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gmasupply. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: