3.5 sec in total
272 ms
3 sec
289 ms
Visit gniazdka.net now to see the best up-to-date Gniazdka content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gniazdka.net
Najlepszy wybór gniazdek elektrycznych. Oferujemy kontakty Gira, Berker, Ospel, Kontakt Simon, Legrand, ABB, Schneider i inne.
Visit gniazdka.netWe analyzed Gniazdka.net page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gniazdka.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.2 s
43/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value1,080 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
272 ms
597 ms
902 ms
30 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Gniazdka.net, 13% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Gniazdka.net.
Page size can be reduced by 131.1 kB (11%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Gniazdka.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 727.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gniazdka images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 964 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gniazdka.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (53%)
95
45
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gniazdka. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gniazdka.net
272 ms
gniazdka.net
597 ms
v_27_94ca0c9d7e8666a209b3b86ae50e35ea_all.css
902 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
30 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
27 ms
jquery.easing.js
22 ms
tools.js
25 ms
global.js
34 ms
10-bootstrap.min.js
37 ms
15-jquery.total-storage.min.js
36 ms
15-jquery.uniform-modified-pts.js
46 ms
onepagecheckoutps.js
390 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
45 ms
products-comparison.js
47 ms
jquery.themepunch.enablelog.js
56 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.js
61 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
62 ms
treeManagement.js
64 ms
front16.js
73 ms
front-list.js
72 ms
index.js
73 ms
leocustomajax.js
83 ms
countdown.js
86 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
84 ms
jquery.serialScroll.js
94 ms
responsive.css
94 ms
font-awesome.min.css
96 ms
test33.css
102 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
105 ms
email-decode.min.js
6 ms
ups_logo.png
86 ms
gniazdkanet-logo-14950255018.jpg
348 ms
call.png
28 ms
mail.png
26 ms
godziny_otwarcia.png
362 ms
abb_70.png
26 ms
logo_berker_by%20hager%20kopiuj.png
26 ms
Gira%20kopiuj.png
32 ms
karlik%20kopiuj.png
31 ms
kontakt%20simon%20kopiuj.png
32 ms
legrand_logo%20kopiuj.png
31 ms
ospel%20kopiuj.png
85 ms
Jung.png
84 ms
Schneider-Electric-Logo%20kopiuj.png
86 ms
Efapel%20kopiuj.png
84 ms
logo_livolo%20kopiuj.png
101 ms
GiGambarelli_G.png
99 ms
900_500_slide_000000.jpg
101 ms
jung_ls_slider.png
101 ms
JUNG_LOGO_.png
103 ms
banner-r1.jpg
539 ms
banner-celiane.jpg
134 ms
abb.png
103 ms
Gira.png
133 ms
jung_.png
453 ms
kontakt%20simon.png
134 ms
Berker.png
135 ms
legrand_logo.png
135 ms
ospel.png
136 ms
Schneider-Electric-Logo.png
138 ms
Efapel.png
145 ms
logo_livolo.png
146 ms
GiGambarelli.png
153 ms
karlik.png
194 ms
5.png
200 ms
gniazdkanet-1426619287-8.jpg
194 ms
loga.png
181 ms
logo-dhl.jpg
252 ms
ssl_comodo.png
253 ms
pok1-white-stamp-big.png
276 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8JoA.woff
77 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
818 ms
paypal-karty.png
272 ms
timer.png
290 ms
loader.gif
253 ms
sdk.js
125 ms
analytics.js
123 ms
default
323 ms
sdk.js
23 ms
collect
41 ms
collect
44 ms
48 ms
js
76 ms
collect
33 ms
js
119 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
174 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
222 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
222 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
218 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
235 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
220 ms
twk-main.js
236 ms
twk-vendor.js
322 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
367 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
390 ms
twk-runtime.js
273 ms
twk-app.js
242 ms
gniazdka.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gniazdka.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
gniazdka.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gniazdka.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gniazdka.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gniazdka.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gniazdka. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: