Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

gnipcentral.com

X Enterprise APIs | Twitter Developer Platform

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

999 ms

Page Rendered

227 ms

gnipcentral.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gnipcentral.com now to see the best up-to-date Gnipcentral content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gnipcentral.com

X’s enterprise API platform delivers real-time and historical social data to power your business at scale. Apply for enterprise access to X data here.

Visit gnipcentral.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gnipcentral.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gnipcentral.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,070 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enterprise

72 ms

enterprise

70 ms

enterprise

25 ms

enterprise

41 ms

chirp.css.twhash.a.f.41e1f29c2d4295d68b05db0725781db3.css

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Gnipcentral.com, 24% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.cms-twdigitalassets.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Developer.x.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (357 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.twitter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.1 kB (63%)

Content Size

176.8 kB

After Optimization

65.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Gnipcentral.com main page is 176.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 122.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 110.6 kB

  • Original 122.6 kB
  • After minification 97.1 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 492 B

  • Original 54.2 kB
  • After minification 54.2 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (67%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gnipcentral. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gnipcentral.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gnipcentral.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gnipcentral.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gnipcentral.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gnipcentral.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gnipcentral. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: