Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

godspill.net

Home - Any music of your choice. Follow your favorite artists without the risk of missing a hit song or album.

Page Load Speed

11.4 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

godspill.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Godspill content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about godspill.net

Hear. Feel. Listen. Any music of your choice Follow your favorite artists without the risk of missing a hit song or album. You will receive notifications for everyone you follow. Tired of looking for ...

Visit godspill.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Godspill.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

godspill.net performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.godspill.net

2166 ms

css

40 ms

global.css

386 ms

swipebox.min.css

539 ms

style.css

680 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Godspill.net, 25% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Godspill.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

309.9 kB

After Optimization

194.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Godspill.net main page is 309.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 146.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 111.1 kB

  • Original 146.2 kB
  • After minification 144.3 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 27.6 kB
  • After minification 27.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Godspill images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 136.1 kB
  • After minification 136.1 kB
  • After compression 131.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Godspill.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (91%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Godspill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

godspill.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

godspill.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

godspill.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Godspill.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Godspill.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Godspill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: