Tools & Wizards About Us
goldcoasticecream.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

goldcoasticecream.com

goldcoasticecream.com

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

15 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

126 ms

goldcoasticecream.com screenshot

About Website

Visit goldcoasticecream.com now to see the best up-to-date Goldcoasticecream content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about goldcoasticecream.com

Forsale Lander

Visit goldcoasticecream.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goldcoasticecream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goldcoasticecream.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,330 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goldcoasticecream.com

15 ms

goldcoasticecream.com

106 ms

uxcore2.min.css

50 ms

no-header.css

40 ms

886969df27d8cc2a.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Goldcoasticecream.com, 58% (15 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 27% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 362.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

623.1 kB

After Optimization

260.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goldcoasticecream.com main page is 623.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 433.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 109.4 kB

  • Original 153.5 kB
  • After minification 153.4 kB
  • After compression 44.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 253.1 kB

  • Original 433.1 kB
  • After minification 432.6 kB
  • After compression 180.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 253.1 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 36.5 kB
  • After minification 36.5 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goldcoasticecream.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (91%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goldcoasticecream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

goldcoasticecream.com

goldcoasticecream.com

15 ms

goldcoasticecream.com

goldcoasticecream.com

106 ms

uxcore2.min.css

uxcore2.min.css

50 ms

no-header.css

no-header.css

40 ms

886969df27d8cc2a.css

886969df27d8cc2a.css

69 ms

c7d3552d3f9756fd.css

c7d3552d3f9756fd.css

57 ms

6c2ff79dfd77eda8.css

6c2ff79dfd77eda8.css

119 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

102 ms

webpack-77567415b9c1c26a.js

webpack-77567415b9c1c26a.js

70 ms

framework-dbea89470bd6302a.js

framework-dbea89470bd6302a.js

56 ms

main-74e713d3b47a5490.js

main-74e713d3b47a5490.js

73 ms

_app-2a69b8ef62e5d6f5.js

_app-2a69b8ef62e5d6f5.js

80 ms

974-59f721d4e0de4803.js

974-59f721d4e0de4803.js

86 ms

414-86140ac5941e8c65.js

414-86140ac5941e8c65.js

100 ms

188-dca07574c0148c9e.js

188-dca07574c0148c9e.js

105 ms

%5Bdomain%5D-72d39de791050e94.js

%5Bdomain%5D-72d39de791050e94.js

109 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

165 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

143 ms

uxcore2.min.js

uxcore2.min.js

32 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

40 ms

heartbeat.js

heartbeat.js

37 ms

polyfill.js

polyfill.js

1287 ms

scc-gpl-c1.min.js

scc-gpl-c1.min.js

47 ms

no-header.js

no-header.js

47 ms

esw.min.js

esw.min.js

46 ms

aksb.min.js

aksb.min.js

26 ms

Accessibility Review

goldcoasticecream.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

goldcoasticecream.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

goldcoasticecream.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goldcoasticecream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goldcoasticecream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goldcoasticecream.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goldcoasticecream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: