3.1 sec in total
617 ms
1.7 sec
757 ms
Click here to check amazing Golf Vergleich content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about golf-vergleich.de
Für Sie getestet: Vollmitgliedschaften, Fernmitgliedschaften, Golfreisen und mehr. Unser Golf-Vergleich verrät Ihnen, wo Sie 2023 preiswert golfen können!
Visit golf-vergleich.deWe analyzed Golf-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 617 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
golf-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.122
84/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
617 ms
108 ms
212 ms
375 ms
287 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Golf-vergleich.de, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (617 ms) belongs to the original domain Golf-vergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 109.9 kB (16%)
698.0 kB
588.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Golf-vergleich.de main page is 698.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 273.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 281 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Golf Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 72 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 434 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Golf-vergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (38%)
32
20
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Golf Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.golf-vergleich.de
617 ms
3wtib.css
108 ms
5xnd5.css
212 ms
3wtib.css
375 ms
post-8476.css
287 ms
6e56o.css
382 ms
post-7484.css
294 ms
js
56 ms
3wtib.css
436 ms
3wtib.js
556 ms
3wtib.js
435 ms
6e56o.js
592 ms
golf-vergleich-testlogo-1-250x55.gif
155 ms
golfvergleich-golfen-768x350.jpg
279 ms
golffernmitgliedschaft-klein.jpg
159 ms
blank.gif
160 ms
gtm.js
60 ms
astra.woff
166 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
golf-platzreife-klein.jpg
101 ms
golf-lagerverkauf-klein.jpg
104 ms
daniel-267x400.jpg
100 ms
testsieger-guenstiger-golfe.png
106 ms
golf-sondermitgliedschaft-klein.jpg
134 ms
golf-vollmitgliedschaft-klein.jpg
187 ms
golf-ratgeber-klein.jpg
200 ms
golfrabatte-klein.jpg
202 ms
golf-simulator-klein.jpg
206 ms
golffilme-klein.jpg
209 ms
golfreisen-klein.jpg
236 ms
golfzubehoer-klein.jpg
282 ms
golf-apps-klein.jpg
297 ms
css
41 ms
collect
12 ms
golf-vergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
golf-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
golf-vergleich.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Golf-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Golf-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
golf-vergleich.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Golf Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: