4.2 sec in total
365 ms
2.4 sec
1.5 sec
Welcome to golfreviewpoint.com homepage info - get ready to check Golf Review Point best content right away, or after learning these important things about golfreviewpoint.com
The quality of your cart’s battery can be the difference between a good round of golf or a sluggish one. Check our reviews of the best golf cart batteries
Visit golfreviewpoint.comWe analyzed Golfreviewpoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 365 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
golfreviewpoint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.136
80/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
365 ms
65 ms
42 ms
19 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Golfreviewpoint.com, 18% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) belongs to the original domain Golfreviewpoint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 133.6 kB (18%)
737.0 kB
603.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Golfreviewpoint.com main page is 737.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Golf Review Point images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 798 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 438 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Golfreviewpoint.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (79%)
43
9
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Golf Review Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
golfreviewpoint.com
365 ms
js
65 ms
css
42 ms
style.min.css
19 ms
kk-star-ratings.min.css
23 ms
dashicons.min.css
26 ms
frontend.min.css
35 ms
style-frontend-pro.css
37 ms
style.css
36 ms
rounded-thumbs.min.css
33 ms
screen.min.css
29 ms
unsemantic-grid.min.css
34 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
mobile.min.css
45 ms
font-icons.min.css
44 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.spinner.css
45 ms
all.css
39 ms
v4-shims.css
48 ms
style-min.css
45 ms
navigation-branding.min.css
45 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
241 ms
jquery.min.js
245 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
52 ms
shortcodes.css
52 ms
icons.css
54 ms
kk-star-ratings.min.js
52 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
71 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
341 ms
front-end-free.js
71 ms
menu.min.js
341 ms
back-to-top.min.js
72 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extra.min.js
80 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.srcset.min.js
340 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extend.js
91 ms
table-maker-front.js
102 ms
stacktable.js
344 ms
index.js
460 ms
logo-use-2.png
57 ms
lazy_placeholder.gif
56 ms
loading.gif
56 ms
editor_badge.png
56 ms
Best-12-volt-golf-cart-batteries-150x150.jpg
57 ms
srpx-a8azb8-150x150.jpg
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
87 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
85 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
85 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
84 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
85 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
86 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
45 ms
generatepress.woff
232 ms
forkawesome-webfont.woff
412 ms
best-golf-cart-batteries.jpg
19 ms
golfreviewpoint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
golfreviewpoint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
golfreviewpoint.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Golfreviewpoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Golfreviewpoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
golfreviewpoint.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Golf Review Point. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: