2.4 sec in total
904 ms
1.4 sec
73 ms
Click here to check amazing Good content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about good.gd
good.gd即得图床成立与2008年,我们励志成为免费公益图床的天花板,让免费图床更上一层楼.
Visit good.gdWe analyzed Good.gd page load time and found that the first response time was 904 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
good.gd performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value4.1 s
48/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value1,580 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
904 ms
239 ms
478 ms
487 ms
489 ms
Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Good.gd and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (904 ms) belongs to the original domain Good.gd.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 kB (66%)
1.6 kB
541 B
In fact, the total size of Good.gd main page is 1.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
0
0
Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.
good.gd
904 ms
ext-all.css
239 ms
ext-base.js
478 ms
ext-all.js
487 ms
lang.js
489 ms
good.gd accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
good.gd best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
good.gd SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Good.gd can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Good.gd main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
good.gd
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Good. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: