Tools & Wizards About Us
goodbag.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

goodbag.ru

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

555 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

380 ms

goodbag.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodbag content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodbag.ru

Visit goodbag.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodbag.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 555 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodbag.ru performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodbag.ru

555 ms

css

26 ms

default.css

140 ms

fonts.css

270 ms

pic02.jpg

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Goodbag.ru, 26% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Goodbag.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

238.7 kB

After Optimization

196.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodbag.ru main page is 238.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 198.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 198.7 kB
  • After minification 188.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goodbag images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 29.9 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodbag.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodbag. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

goodbag.ru

goodbag.ru

555 ms

css

css

26 ms

default.css

default.css

140 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

270 ms

pic02.jpg

pic02.jpg

275 ms

pic01.jpg

pic01.jpg

803 ms

pik1.jpg

pik1.jpg

326 ms

pik3.jpg

pik3.jpg

324 ms

pik4.jpg

pik4.jpg

325 ms

pik5.jpg

pik5.jpg

400 ms

pik6.jpg

pik6.jpg

401 ms

pik7.jpg

pik7.jpg

408 ms

pik8.jpg

pik8.jpg

410 ms

pik9.jpg

pik9.jpg

411 ms

pik10.jpg

pik10.jpg

533 ms

hit

hit

261 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf

8 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf

16 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

19 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf

30 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf

16 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf

16 ms

hit

hit

131 ms

Accessibility Review

goodbag.ru accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

goodbag.ru best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

goodbag.ru SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodbag.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Goodbag.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodbag.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goodbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: