Tools & Wizards About Us
goodhousekeeper.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

Find a local Housekeeper in London, Wimbledon, Richmond, Loughton, Chigwell, Buckhurst Hill, Essex, Kent, Surrey , Hertfordshire, Sussex, Somerset and...

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

258 ms

goodhousekeeper.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to goodhousekeeper.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Good Housekeeper best content right away, or after learning these important things about goodhousekeeper.co.uk

The smartest and easy way to find a local Housekeeper, Cleaner, Childcarer or other Domestic help in UK. Post your job and registered Housekeepers will reply back.

Visit goodhousekeeper.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodhousekeeper.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodhousekeeper.co.uk performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.262

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

273 ms

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

317 ms

www.goodhousekeeper.co.uk

527 ms

css

30 ms

settings.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Goodhousekeeper.co.uk, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (722 ms) belongs to the original domain Goodhousekeeper.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

795.6 kB

After Optimization

724.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodhousekeeper.co.uk main page is 795.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 645.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 645.4 kB
  • After minification 630.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Good Housekeeper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 21.3 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 75.1 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 63.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodhousekeeper.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (80%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Good Housekeeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

273 ms

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

317 ms

www.goodhousekeeper.co.uk

www.goodhousekeeper.co.uk

527 ms

css

css

30 ms

settings.css

settings.css

83 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

167 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

227 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

240 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

240 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

245 ms

summernote.css

summernote.css

252 ms

animate.css

animate.css

253 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

301 ms

essentials.css

essentials.css

397 ms

layout.css

layout.css

318 ms

layout-responsive.css

layout-responsive.css

323 ms

orange.css

orange.css

329 ms

uploadifive.css

uploadifive.css

330 ms

custom.css

custom.css

374 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

404 ms

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

483 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

413 ms

jquery.uploadifive.min.js

jquery.uploadifive.min.js

413 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

448 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

474 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

476 ms

bootbox.min.js

bootbox.min.js

576 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

577 ms

summernote.min.js

summernote.min.js

601 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

577 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

653 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

578 ms

slider_revolution.js

slider_revolution.js

577 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

578 ms

functions.js

functions.js

652 ms

ga.js

ga.js

674 ms

zopim.js

zopim.js

674 ms

logo.png

logo.png

172 ms

slider_3.jpg

slider_3.jpg

479 ms

slider_4.jpg

slider_4.jpg

722 ms

footer_sprite.png

footer_sprite.png

264 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

31 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

259 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

15 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

15 ms

ga.js

ga.js

87 ms

v2.zopim.com

v2.zopim.com

107 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

83 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

83 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

87 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

asset_composer.js

asset_composer.js

43 ms

Accessibility Review

goodhousekeeper.co.uk accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

goodhousekeeper.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

goodhousekeeper.co.uk SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodhousekeeper.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodhousekeeper.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodhousekeeper.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Good Housekeeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: