Tools & Wizards About Us
goodink.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

goodink.uk

Creative Design Studio Based in Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

829 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

63 ms

goodink.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodink content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodink.uk

Established in 2017, GoodInk Creative Design Co. is a busy creative studio based in Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom. We have established a trusted reputation for providing high-quality and affordable ...

Visit goodink.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodink.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 829 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodink.uk performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodink.uk

829 ms

style.css

125 ms

fonts.css

308 ms

css

22 ms

jquery.min.js

489 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Goodink.uk, 44% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.bunny.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (829 ms) belongs to the original domain Goodink.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.7 kB (71%)

Content Size

173.8 kB

After Optimization

51.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodink.uk main page is 173.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 103.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 82 B

  • Original 173 B
  • After minification 91 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Goodink needs image optimization as it can save up to 82 B or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 67.2 kB

  • Original 103.1 kB
  • After minification 102.5 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 61.6 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodink.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodink. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

goodink.uk

goodink.uk

829 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

308 ms

css

css

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

489 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

273 ms

jquery.frontend.js

jquery.frontend.js

258 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

275 ms

coming-soon-desktop.svg

coming-soon-desktop.svg

538 ms

ubuntu-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

ubuntu-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

16 ms

ubuntu-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

ubuntu-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

10 ms

ubuntu-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

ubuntu-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

8 ms

ubuntu-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

ubuntu-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

6 ms

ubuntu-latin-400-normal.woff

ubuntu-latin-400-normal.woff

8 ms

ubuntu-greek-400-normal.woff

ubuntu-greek-400-normal.woff

9 ms

foundation-icons.woff

foundation-icons.woff

121 ms

Accessibility Review

goodink.uk accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

goodink.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

goodink.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodink.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goodink.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodink.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goodink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: