Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

goodlife.de

GOODLIFE | Anti Aging NaturKosmetik & Wellnessprodukte

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

goodlife.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to goodlife.de homepage info - get ready to check GOODLIFE best content right away, or after learning these important things about goodlife.de

Hochwertige Anti Aging Naturkosmetik mit Hyaluronsäure, Saneo2 Sauerstoffkosmetik & Wellnessprodukte für Gesundheit & Schönheit von Markenherstellern aller Welt

Visit goodlife.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodlife.de page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodlife.de performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodlife.de

334 ms

en

581 ms

highslide.css

291 ms

highslide.js

499 ms

highslide-mondo.js

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Goodlife.de, 86% (44 requests) were made to Goodlife-shop.de and 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) relates to the external source Goodlife-shop.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.7 kB (49%)

Content Size

494.5 kB

After Optimization

253.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Goodlife.de main page is 494.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 203.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 49.2 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 203.1 kB
  • After minification 185.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GOODLIFE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 135.9 kB

  • Original 187.8 kB
  • After minification 162.8 kB
  • After compression 51.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 54.5 kB
  • After minification 44.8 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodlife.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (25%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GOODLIFE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

goodlife.de accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

goodlife.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

goodlife.de SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodlife.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodlife.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GOODLIFE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: