Tools & Wizards About Us
goodpractice.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

goodpractice.net

Learning & Development Solutions | Mind Tools for Business

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

goodpractice.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodpractice content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodpractice.net

Evidence based learning that works. See our end-to-end performance solutions that are driven by insight, engage, inspire and work smart to help your people reach their potential.

Visit goodpractice.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodpractice.net page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodpractice.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value33,730 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodpractice.net

192 ms

mindtoolsbusiness.com

755 ms

gtm.js

76 ms

plugin.js

373 ms

styles.bundle.css

385 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Goodpractice.net, 38% (30 requests) were made to Mindtoolsbusiness.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Mindtoolsbusiness.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 637.5 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodpractice.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 984.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 148.0 kB

  • Original 196.9 kB
  • After minification 175.0 kB
  • After compression 49.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 120.2 kB

  • Original 984.2 kB
  • After minification 864.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Goodpractice needs image optimization as it can save up to 120.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 44.4 kB

  • Original 177.4 kB
  • After minification 177.4 kB
  • After compression 133.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.4 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 325.0 kB

  • Original 408.6 kB
  • After minification 408.4 kB
  • After compression 83.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodpractice.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (67%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodpractice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

goodpractice.net

goodpractice.net

192 ms

mindtoolsbusiness.com

mindtoolsbusiness.com

755 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

76 ms

plugin.js

plugin.js

373 ms

styles.bundle.css

styles.bundle.css

385 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

59 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

51 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

150 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

49 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

338 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

138 ms

js

js

45 ms

file-uploader.js

file-uploader.js

436 ms

media-files-selector.admin.js

media-files-selector.admin.js

435 ms

page-selector.admin.js

page-selector.admin.js

520 ms

path-selector.admin.js

path-selector.admin.js

520 ms

updatableFormHelper.js

updatableFormHelper.js

646 ms

inputmask.dependencyLib.js

inputmask.dependencyLib.js

646 ms

inputmask.js

inputmask.js

1181 ms

jquery-1.8.0.min.js

jquery-1.8.0.min.js

1185 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

687 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

684 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

997 ms

common.bundle.js

common.bundle.js

1179 ms

styles.bundle.js

styles.bundle.js

995 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

35 ms

collect

collect

201 ms

278 ms

GcFfDeJnSu4

GcFfDeJnSu4

350 ms

s6p2b

s6p2b

203 ms

B2B_Carousel_Left_Shapes_Shadow

B2B_Carousel_Left_Shapes_Shadow

680 ms

LPB-carousel

LPB-carousel

1296 ms

101_03_Carousell-(2)

101_03_Carousell-(2)

1354 ms

CTA-suzanne-1-Header-2-lines

CTA-suzanne-1-Header-2-lines

1730 ms

Blog-resources

Blog-resources

1294 ms

Events-and-webinars-resources

Events-and-webinars-resources

1294 ms

Podcast-resources

Podcast-resources

1293 ms

virgin-money

virgin-money

1355 ms

booking

booking

1356 ms

EW_Web_CaseStudy_Carousel_Images_AstraZeneca

EW_Web_CaseStudy_Carousel_Images_AstraZeneca

2317 ms

icon--chevron-down.svg

icon--chevron-down.svg

1354 ms

Fosway_Grid_2022_white

Fosway_Grid_2022_white

1727 ms

collect

collect

174 ms

font.woff

font.woff

1619 ms

font.woff

font.woff

1730 ms

font.woff

font.woff

1730 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

124 ms

uwt.js

uwt.js

108 ms

hotjar-1680777.js

hotjar-1680777.js

249 ms

oct.js

oct.js

123 ms

160 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

124 ms

923591078224775

923591078224775

143 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

46 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

55 ms

base.js

base.js

102 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

96 ms

modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js

modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js

804 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

683 ms

adsct

adsct

1143 ms

adsct

adsct

1146 ms

NAdTarfwBmmVN2jO9_ZDZXbW2JobdXK1pZJ09rC2Bcw.js

NAdTarfwBmmVN2jO9_ZDZXbW2JobdXK1pZJ09rC2Bcw.js

576 ms

embed.js

embed.js

497 ms

adsct

adsct

977 ms

adsct

adsct

945 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

224 ms

id

id

174 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

588 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

592 ms

adsct

adsct

638 ms

adsct

adsct

642 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

443 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

242 ms

Create

Create

125 ms

GcFfDeJnSu4

GcFfDeJnSu4

400 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

127 ms

VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js

VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js

72 ms

102 ms

id

id

96 ms

Accessibility Review

goodpractice.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

goodpractice.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

goodpractice.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodpractice.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goodpractice.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodpractice.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goodpractice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: