Tools & Wizards About Us
goodtouchlight.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

goodtouchlight.com

Eink display | Touch screen | LCD screen | OLED screen | Electronic component | Glass panel

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

567 ms

goodtouchlight.com screenshot

About Website

Visit goodtouchlight.com now to see the best up-to-date Good Touch Light content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about goodtouchlight.com

Provide one-stop display touch solution,low power,multi-dot touch,customized display touch,RS232 UART LCD display touch module,readable in sun display touch module,Square circular display touch produc...

Visit goodtouchlight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodtouchlight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodtouchlight.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,940 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodtouchlight.com

199 ms

www.goodtouchlight.com

590 ms

style.css

124 ms

style.php

202 ms

all.min.css

254 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Goodtouchlight.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (977 ms) belongs to the original domain Goodtouchlight.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (19%)

Content Size

14.3 MB

After Optimization

11.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodtouchlight.com main page is 14.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 48.3 kB

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 2.6 MB

  • Original 13.7 MB
  • After minification 11.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Good Touch Light needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 MB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 65.7 kB

  • Original 432.5 kB
  • After minification 432.5 kB
  • After compression 366.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 126.8 kB
  • After minification 126.8 kB
  • After compression 106.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodtouchlight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (56%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Good Touch Light. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

goodtouchlight.com

goodtouchlight.com

199 ms

www.goodtouchlight.com

www.goodtouchlight.com

590 ms

style.css

style.css

124 ms

style.php

style.php

202 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

254 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

245 ms

front.css

front.css

196 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

267 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

199 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

286 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

330 ms

front.js

front.js

329 ms

js

js

85 ms

js

js

162 ms

js

js

162 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

455 ms

imgfade.js

imgfade.js

322 ms

animation.css

animation.css

451 ms

flexslider-min.js

flexslider-min.js

449 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

398 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

399 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

530 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

399 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

400 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

529 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

97 ms

open.png

open.png

96 ms

us.png

us.png

99 ms

sa.png

sa.png

98 ms

fr.png

fr.png

98 ms

de.png

de.png

97 ms

id.png

id.png

195 ms

it.png

it.png

195 ms

jp.png

jp.png

194 ms

kr.png

kr.png

194 ms

my.png

my.png

193 ms

ir.png

ir.png

193 ms

ru.png

ru.png

236 ms

tr.png

tr.png

234 ms

vn.png

vn.png

236 ms

search2.png

search2.png

234 ms

01-2.png

01-2.png

950 ms

02-1.png

02-1.png

944 ms

03-1.png

03-1.png

963 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

353 ms

SY4.png

SY4.png

533 ms

SY1.png

SY1.png

954 ms

SY5.png

SY5.png

491 ms

SY3.png

SY3.png

540 ms

5.png

5.png

957 ms

Tu1-1.png

Tu1-1.png

959 ms

10-5.png

10-5.png

967 ms

8-3.png

8-3.png

966 ms

JK9.png

JK9.png

975 ms

TSTP1-1.png

TSTP1-1.png

969 ms

17.png

17.png

971 ms

5.5-OLED-2.png

5.5-OLED-2.png

973 ms

Tu.png

Tu.png

977 ms

21-3.png

21-3.png

891 ms

7-4.png

7-4.png

892 ms

DT.png

DT.png

894 ms

GL2.jpg

GL2.jpg

897 ms

WeC.png

WeC.png

893 ms

142 ms

166 ms

635MImMGGkA

635MImMGGkA

210 ms

9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff

9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff

794 ms

IiXlpgn5dX02VcrrQmX6hg.woff

IiXlpgn5dX02VcrrQmX6hg.woff

793 ms

wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff

wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff

808 ms

yUTNPmn1DyOttxIsPHkHvPY6323mHUZFJMgTvxaG2iE.woff

yUTNPmn1DyOttxIsPHkHvPY6323mHUZFJMgTvxaG2iE.woff

913 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

913 ms

back_to_top.png

back_to_top.png

891 ms

chatbg.png

chatbg.png

890 ms

mtops.png

mtops.png

890 ms

84 ms

78 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

54 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

87 ms

base.js

base.js

177 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

353 ms

fSwQ49dNtQ0TRgWZKHlAIhVKPl4K4-2hZ-2qmgklZeM.js

fSwQ49dNtQ0TRgWZKHlAIhVKPl4K4-2hZ-2qmgklZeM.js

279 ms

embed.js

embed.js

181 ms

id

id

125 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

176 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

177 ms

Create

Create

176 ms

Accessibility Review

goodtouchlight.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

goodtouchlight.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

goodtouchlight.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodtouchlight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodtouchlight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodtouchlight.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Good Touch Light. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: