Tools & Wizards About Us
goodybag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

goodybag.com

Goodybag: Order Catering for your Office - BiteSquad.com

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

935 ms

Page Rendered

535 ms

goodybag.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodybag content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodybag.com

Goodybag provides catering for your office. We feature 100+ restaurants to make it easy for companies to order food delivery for lunch, meetings, and events!

Visit goodybag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodybag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodybag.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.goodybag.com

79 ms

www.goodybag.com

75 ms

gb-icon.css

55 ms

goodybag.css

60 ms

landing.js

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Goodybag.com, 54% (20 requests) were made to D3bqck8kwfkhx5.cloudfront.net and 14% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.filepicker.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (587 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.filepicker.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 882.8 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Goodybag.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 32.2 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 192.2 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Goodybag needs image optimization as it can save up to 192.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 663.0 kB

  • Original 935.3 kB
  • After minification 935.3 kB
  • After compression 272.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 663.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodybag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.goodybag.com

www.goodybag.com

79 ms

www.goodybag.com

www.goodybag.com

75 ms

gb-icon.css

gb-icon.css

55 ms

goodybag.css

goodybag.css

60 ms

landing.js

landing.js

109 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

448 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

370 ms

wp-engine.png

wp-engine.png

294 ms

convert

convert

535 ms

convert

convert

587 ms

convert

convert

586 ms

convert

convert

557 ms

convert

convert

579 ms

broadway.png

broadway.png

348 ms

apple.png

apple.png

345 ms

mindshift.png

mindshift.png

348 ms

hot-schedules.png

hot-schedules.png

345 ms

logo.png

logo.png

290 ms

landing-hero-unit-bg.jpg

landing-hero-unit-bg.jpg

294 ms

landingpage-restaurants2.jpg

landingpage-restaurants2.jpg

426 ms

landing-hiw-1.png

landing-hiw-1.png

423 ms

landing-hiw-2.png

landing-hiw-2.png

348 ms

landing-hiw-3.png

landing-hiw-3.png

346 ms

landing-sandwich.jpg

landing-sandwich.jpg

425 ms

product-screen-2.jpg

product-screen-2.jpg

553 ms

checkpoints-bullet.svg

checkpoints-bullet.svg

348 ms

speech-box-triangle-left.png

speech-box-triangle-left.png

349 ms

speech-box-triangle-right.png

speech-box-triangle-right.png

403 ms

2D0CFD_3_0.woff

2D0CFD_3_0.woff

461 ms

2D0CFD_6_0.woff

2D0CFD_6_0.woff

415 ms

2D0CFD_B_0.woff

2D0CFD_B_0.woff

521 ms

2D0CFD_1_0.woff

2D0CFD_1_0.woff

272 ms

2D0CFD_7_0.woff

2D0CFD_7_0.woff

271 ms

2D0CFD_A_0.woff

2D0CFD_A_0.woff

250 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

175 ms

collect

collect

91 ms

collect

collect

155 ms

Accessibility Review

goodybag.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

goodybag.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

goodybag.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodybag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodybag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodybag.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goodybag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: