Tools & Wizards About Us
gophygital.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

gophygital.io

GoPhygital | Global Business IT Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

826 ms

Page Rendered

464 ms

gophygital.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gophygital.io homepage info - get ready to check Go Phygital best content right away, or after learning these important things about gophygital.io

Global Business Services Tailored to your needs GoPhygital stands as a beacon in the realm of global business services. Reach Out Instantly

Visit gophygital.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Gophygital.io page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gophygital.io performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gophygital.io

76 ms

gophygital.io

87 ms

css

34 ms

bootstrap.css

63 ms

style.css

125 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Gophygital.io, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) relates to the external source Fastbase.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (38%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gophygital.io main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 58.1 kB
  • After minification 34.9 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.2 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 141.2 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Go Phygital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 568.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 987.2 kB
  • After compression 453.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 568.8 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 552.2 kB

  • Original 642.4 kB
  • After minification 579.5 kB
  • After compression 90.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gophygital.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 552.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (60%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Go Phygital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gophygital.io

gophygital.io

76 ms

gophygital.io

gophygital.io

87 ms

css

css

34 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

63 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

dark.css

dark.css

67 ms

font-icons.css

font-icons.css

71 ms

animate.css

animate.css

84 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

47 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

86 ms

style_custom.css

style_custom.css

87 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

103 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

108 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

171 ms

js_custom.js

js_custom.js

98 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

101 ms

functions.js

functions.js

136 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

js

js

73 ms

fscript.js

fscript.js

376 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

226 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

83 ms

logo.png

logo.png

112 ms

logo2x.png

logo2x.png

111 ms

close.png

close.png

83 ms

call.png

call.png

83 ms

contact.png

contact.png

83 ms

mob_mac.png

mob_mac.png

112 ms

pattern2.jpg

pattern2.jpg

112 ms

banner_img_7.jpg

banner_img_7.jpg

228 ms

banner_img_1.jpg

banner_img_1.jpg

201 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

201 ms

2.webp

2.webp

149 ms

3.webp

3.webp

149 ms

case-study-adani.jpg

case-study-adani.jpg

229 ms

case-study-sonic-hub-img2.jpg

case-study-sonic-hub-img2.jpg

234 ms

case-study-steps_01.jpg

case-study-steps_01.jpg

232 ms

gophygital-clients-logos-gray-home.jpg

gophygital-clients-logos-gray-home.jpg

229 ms

home-testi-bg.jpg

home-testi-bg.jpg

229 ms

footer_icon.png

footer_icon.png

230 ms

widget-link-dark.png

widget-link-dark.png

232 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

119 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

134 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

195 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

197 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

197 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

196 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

196 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

198 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

252 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

112 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

91 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

175 ms

55xqey1sJNPjPiv1ZZZrxK1-4b_oKw.ttf

55xqey1sJNPjPiv1ZZZrxK1-4b_oKw.ttf

8 ms

Accessibility Review

gophygital.io accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gophygital.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gophygital.io SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gophygital.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gophygital.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gophygital.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Go Phygital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: