Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

gorefield.com

Welcome to Gorefield Parish Council | Gorefield, UK

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

197 ms

gorefield.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gorefield.com homepage info - get ready to check Gorefield best content right away, or after learning these important things about gorefield.com

Gorefield is a small village of about 850 residents situated 4 miles north west of the port of Wisbech in the Cambridgeshire Fens.

Visit gorefield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gorefield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gorefield.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gorefield.com

179 ms

www.gorefield.com

468 ms

css

58 ms

style.css

78 ms

sdk.js

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Gorefield.com, 15% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Gorefield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.8 kB (6%)

Content Size

827.9 kB

After Optimization

774.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Gorefield.com main page is 827.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 756.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 26.4 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

  • Original 756.7 kB
  • After minification 729.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gorefield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 357 B

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 32.8 kB
  • After compression 32.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gorefield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (27%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gorefield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gorefield.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gorefield.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gorefield.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gorefield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gorefield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gorefield. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: