4.2 sec in total
116 ms
3.8 sec
214 ms
Click here to check amazing GP Conservation content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gpconservation.com
Visit gpconservation.comWe analyzed Gpconservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
gpconservation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.3 s
0/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.133
81/100
15%
Value20.7 s
2/100
10%
116 ms
1544 ms
294 ms
51 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Gpconservation.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Webassets.generalpacific.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Gpconservation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 308.4 kB (8%)
4.0 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Gpconservation.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 220.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, GP Conservation needs image optimization as it can save up to 220.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gpconservation.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (69%)
65
20
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GP Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gpconservation.com
116 ms
gpconservation.com
1544 ms
wc-authorize-net-cim-checkout-block.css
294 ms
style.css
51 ms
selectize.css
46 ms
price-slider.css
56 ms
product-search.css
49 ms
bootstrap.min.css
487 ms
genpac-slider.css
47 ms
public.min.css
290 ms
woo-custom-related-products-public.css
56 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
62 ms
woocommerce.css
59 ms
sv-wc-payment-gateway-payment-form.min.css
305 ms
wc-avatax-frontend.min.css
65 ms
style.css
69 ms
style.css
70 ms
gpconservation.css
76 ms
all.css
640 ms
jquery.js
79 ms
jquery-migrate.js
80 ms
public.min.js
83 ms
woo-custom-related-products-public.js
88 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
99 ms
add-to-cart.js
95 ms
js.cookie.js
98 ms
woocommerce.js
105 ms
jquery.zoom.min.js
696 ms
gpstorefront.js
109 ms
all.js
1336 ms
bootstrap.min.js
781 ms
genpac.js
109 ms
wc-blocks.css
114 ms
js
65 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.js
117 ms
regenerator-runtime.js
345 ms
wp-polyfill.js
124 ms
hooks.js
128 ms
i18n.js
427 ms
main.js
160 ms
sourcebuster.js
170 ms
order-attribution.js
179 ms
jquery.payment.js
188 ms
sv-wc-payment-gateway-payment-form.js
199 ms
wc-authorize-net-cim.min.js
420 ms
wc-avatax-frontend.min.js
481 ms
frontend.js
490 ms
forms.js
264 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
14 ms
logo-280x50.png
242 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-10.png
252 ms
water-heater-rebate-banner-5-1-1110x350.png
264 ms
Free-Shipping-Graphic3-1110x350.png
275 ms
aerator-banner-3-1110x350.png
262 ms
convectair-banner-option-2-1110x350.png
261 ms
water-heater-banner-1-1110x350.png
264 ms
showerhead-category-2-4.png
476 ms
Panasonic-Category.png
493 ms
clearance.png
511 ms
Convectair.png
516 ms
Lighting-Category-2-1.png
518 ms
water-heater-tanks-1.png
518 ms
Handheld-226x302.jpg
715 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-11.png
311 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-12.png
389 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-13.png
390 ms
Map.png
385 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
453 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
433 ms
fa-light-300.woff
175 ms
gpconservation.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gpconservation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gpconservation.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gpconservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gpconservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gpconservation.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GP Conservation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: