6.6 sec in total
636 ms
2.1 sec
3.9 sec
Visit graceadele.us now to see the best up-to-date Grace Adele content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about graceadele.us
Visit graceadele.usWe analyzed Graceadele.us page load time and found that the first response time was 636 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
graceadele.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value19.6 s
0/100
10%
Value33,490 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value53.5 s
0/100
10%
636 ms
403 ms
161 ms
479 ms
494 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Graceadele.us, 28% (14 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 22% (11 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) belongs to the original domain Graceadele.us.
Page size can be reduced by 516.0 kB (40%)
1.3 MB
765.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Graceadele.us main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 584.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grace Adele images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 213.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graceadele.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (17%)
47
39
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grace Adele. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
graceadele.us
636 ms
serendipity.css
403 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.min.js
161 ms
jquery.js
479 ms
serendipity.js
494 ms
2k11.min.js
86 ms
ICE.XCheckII.arrest.jpg
171 ms
-QVbCBtnIgA
178 ms
twitter.png
129 ms
delicious.png
122 ms
facebook.png
132 ms
diggman.png
122 ms
technorati.png
121 ms
baby-swim.png
963 ms
criminal-defense.png
846 ms
love-relationship.png
703 ms
s9y_banner_small.png
215 ms
PPAiZGd200k
91 ms
go0PFLapokA
84 ms
bDPRWJdVzfs
108 ms
qeEyDXqBIa8
95 ms
ykEMrqrjsck
101 ms
oNpNNbfRixM
140 ms
iNBISMDlXPE
148 ms
BWXPJjc4ta0
188 ms
like.php
509 ms
like.php
587 ms
like.php
599 ms
like.php
612 ms
like.php
621 ms
like.php
628 ms
oxvnli3TLaU
155 ms
hWCMNRLSpAM
159 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
36 ms
www-embed-player.js
76 ms
base.js
140 ms
like.php
661 ms
like.php
790 ms
like.php
667 ms
like.php
787 ms
like.php
787 ms
like.php
786 ms
like.php
682 ms
like.php
691 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
268 ms
ad_status.js
278 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
432 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
79 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
80 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
543 ms
graceadele.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
graceadele.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
graceadele.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graceadele.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graceadele.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
graceadele.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Grace Adele. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: