Tools & Wizards About Us
graceandgoss.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

graceandgoss.com

Home | Grace & Goss Healthcare Management Services

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

258 ms

graceandgoss.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to graceandgoss.com homepage info - get ready to check Grace And Goss best content right away, or after learning these important things about graceandgoss.com

Our expertise in creating solutions for healthcare providers in the US will help healthcare businesses perform at top levels, with minimal costs.

Visit graceandgoss.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Graceandgoss.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graceandgoss.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

graceandgoss.com

36 ms

graceandgoss.org

310 ms

custom-color-overrides.css

122 ms

style.css

134 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Graceandgoss.com, 76% (48 requests) were made to Graceandgoss.org and 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (860 ms) relates to the external source Graceandgoss.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Graceandgoss.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 808.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 102.0 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 808.7 kB
  • After minification 794.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grace And Goss images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 755 B

  • Original 174.9 kB
  • After minification 174.9 kB
  • After compression 174.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 85.1 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 78.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graceandgoss.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (86%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grace And Goss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

graceandgoss.com

graceandgoss.com

36 ms

graceandgoss.org

graceandgoss.org

310 ms

custom-color-overrides.css

custom-color-overrides.css

122 ms

style.css

style.css

134 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

119 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

122 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

131 ms

post-133.css

post-133.css

125 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

235 ms

global.css

global.css

227 ms

post-190.css

post-190.css

224 ms

post-135.css

post-135.css

229 ms

post-163.css

post-163.css

236 ms

post-154.css

post-154.css

242 ms

css

css

42 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

329 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

333 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

345 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

527 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

338 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

346 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

328 ms

post-160.css

post-160.css

439 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

436 ms

responsive-embeds.js

responsive-embeds.js

349 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

464 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

450 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

470 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

605 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

753 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

606 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

607 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

608 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

636 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

668 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

669 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

860 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

608 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

707 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

4 ms

embed

embed

274 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

8 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

552 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

649 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

661 ms

GGHMS-Logo.png

GGHMS-Logo.png

673 ms

blockquote-mark-e6e9ec-b.svg

blockquote-mark-e6e9ec-b.svg

592 ms

js

js

90 ms

GGHMS-Hero-scaled.jpg

GGHMS-Hero-scaled.jpg

378 ms

GGHMS-About-scaled.jpg

GGHMS-About-scaled.jpg

345 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cr_sIaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cr_sIaWMo.woff

42 ms

-W_9XJnvUD7dzB2CA-ofTkA.woff

-W_9XJnvUD7dzB2CA-ofTkA.woff

78 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cy_gIaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cy_gIaWMo.woff

65 ms

-W__XJnvUD7dzB2KYNob.woff

-W__XJnvUD7dzB2KYNob.woff

75 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Ck_kIaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Ck_kIaWMo.woff

75 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cv_4IaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cv_4IaWMo.woff

75 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C2_8IaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C2_8IaWMo.woff

76 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cx_wIaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cx_wIaWMo.woff

75 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C4_0IaWMo.woff

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C4_0IaWMo.woff

127 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

274 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

284 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

301 ms

print.css

print.css

110 ms

Accessibility Review

graceandgoss.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

graceandgoss.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

graceandgoss.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graceandgoss.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graceandgoss.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graceandgoss.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Grace And Goss. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: