Tools & Wizards About Us
gracepacking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

gracepacking.com

Potato Chips Line Manufacturer in India, Kurkure Corn Puff Production Line, Pellet Chips Frying Line, Popcorn Processing Line, Namkeen Processing Mach...

Page Load Speed

9.9 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

gracepacking.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gracepacking.com now to see the best up-to-date Gracepacking content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gracepacking.com

Snack Production Line manufacturer, Potato Chips Processing Line, Extruded Snack Production Line, Kurkure Extruder, Corn Puff Production Line, Popcorn Processing Line, Namkeen Processing Equipment, Au...

Visit gracepacking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gracepacking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gracepacking.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.183

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gracepacking.com

1221 ms

www.gracepacking.com

2027 ms

intlTelInput.css

29 ms

search.js

31 ms

jquery_ui_main.js

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gracepacking.com, 48% (43 requests) were made to Tiimg.tistatic.com and 20% (18 requests) were made to Cpimg.tistatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Cpimg.tistatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gracepacking.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 211.7 kB

  • Original 279.9 kB
  • After minification 270.6 kB
  • After compression 68.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 211.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 899 B

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gracepacking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 108.3 kB
  • After minification 108.3 kB
  • After compression 105.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gracepacking.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (63%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gracepacking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gracepacking.com

gracepacking.com

1221 ms

www.gracepacking.com

www.gracepacking.com

2027 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

29 ms

search.js

search.js

31 ms

jquery_ui_main.js

jquery_ui_main.js

37 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

37 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

37 ms

slick.css

slick.css

36 ms

js

js

73 ms

js

js

124 ms

wz_tooltip.js

wz_tooltip.js

4 ms

tip_balloon.js

tip_balloon.js

3 ms

theme.js

theme.js

621 ms

intlTelInput.js

intlTelInput.js

5 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

5 ms

request_a_callback.css

request_a_callback.css

5 ms

StaticPopup.css

StaticPopup.css

18 ms

StaticPopup.css

StaticPopup.css

789 ms

ga.js

ga.js

9 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

71 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

20 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

7 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

8 ms

collect

collect

50 ms

logo_15003.jpg

logo_15003.jpg

250 ms

template_photo_1.jpg

template_photo_1.jpg

1220 ms

srch-ico.png

srch-ico.png

284 ms

en.jpg

en.jpg

136 ms

es.jpg

es.jpg

135 ms

fr.jpg

fr.jpg

134 ms

de.jpg

de.jpg

134 ms

it.jpg

it.jpg

157 ms

zh_CN.jpg

zh_CN.jpg

157 ms

ja.jpg

ja.jpg

157 ms

ko.jpg

ko.jpg

158 ms

ar.jpg

ar.jpg

159 ms

pt.jpg

pt.jpg

244 ms

call-me-top-online.png

call-me-top-online.png

403 ms

sms-top.png

sms-top.png

404 ms

right-arrow2.png

right-arrow2.png

446 ms

left-arrow2.png

left-arrow2.png

504 ms

icon.png

icon.png

734 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

516 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

632 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

405 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

406 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

408 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

410 ms

trusted-seller.svg

trusted-seller.svg

412 ms

tradeindiamember.gif

tradeindiamember.gif

414 ms

send_inq_Logo.svg

send_inq_Logo.svg

415 ms

Arrow.png

Arrow.png

417 ms

template_photo_2.jpg

template_photo_2.jpg

2057 ms

template_photo_3.jpg

template_photo_3.jpg

2264 ms

template_photo_4.jpg

template_photo_4.jpg

2079 ms

Namkeen-Making-Machine.jpg

Namkeen-Making-Machine.jpg

2087 ms

Puff-Extruder-Machine.jpg

Puff-Extruder-Machine.jpg

1652 ms

Snacks-Extruder-Machine.jpg

Snacks-Extruder-Machine.jpg

1446 ms

Moisture-Mixture-for-Corn-Grit.jpg

Moisture-Mixture-for-Corn-Grit.jpg

1866 ms

Puffs-Making-Machine.jpg

Puffs-Making-Machine.jpg

2075 ms

Puff-Snacks-Rotary-Roaster.jpg

Puff-Snacks-Rotary-Roaster.jpg

2502 ms

Puff-Snacks-Extruder-Machine.jpg

Puff-Snacks-Extruder-Machine.jpg

2296 ms

Kurkure-Extruder-Machines.jpg

Kurkure-Extruder-Machines.jpg

2901 ms

Noodles-Extruder-Machine.jpg

Noodles-Extruder-Machine.jpg

2908 ms

Pasta-Extruder-Machine.jpg

Pasta-Extruder-Machine.jpg

2711 ms

Macaroni-Pasta-Extruder-Machine.jpg

Macaroni-Pasta-Extruder-Machine.jpg

2882 ms

Tea-Bag-Packing-Machine.jpg

Tea-Bag-Packing-Machine.jpg

2726 ms

Tea-Blending-Machine.jpg

Tea-Blending-Machine.jpg

3339 ms

U-Type-Batch-Mixer.jpg

U-Type-Batch-Mixer.jpg

3332 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

253 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

228 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

228 ms

bottom-arrow.png

bottom-arrow.png

638 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

232 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

233 ms

vision-bg.jpg

vision-bg.jpg

1045 ms

up.png

up.png

641 ms

nav-arrow.png

nav-arrow.png

655 ms

stemb.gif

stemb.gif

411 ms

stemt.gif

stemt.gif

412 ms

l.gif

l.gif

414 ms

lb.gif

lb.gif

417 ms

b.gif

b.gif

418 ms

rb.gif

rb.gif

419 ms

r.gif

r.gif

421 ms

rt.gif

rt.gif

422 ms

t.gif

t.gif

424 ms

lt.gif

lt.gif

426 ms

background.gif

background.gif

427 ms

Accessibility Review

gracepacking.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

gracepacking.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gracepacking.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gracepacking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gracepacking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gracepacking.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gracepacking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: