3.7 sec in total
693 ms
2.8 sec
197 ms
Visit graciefolo.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Graciefolo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about graciefolo.co.uk
Visit graciefolo.co.ukWe analyzed Graciefolo.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 693 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
graciefolo.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value320 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.612
10/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
693 ms
328 ms
187 ms
266 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Graciefolo.co.uk, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Graciefolo.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 327.0 kB (54%)
603.5 kB
276.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Graciefolo.co.uk main page is 603.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 301.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graciefolo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 214.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graciefolo.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (60%)
45
18
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graciefolo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
graciefolo.co.uk
693 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
328 ms
styles.css
187 ms
settings.css
266 ms
captions.css
194 ms
style.css
168 ms
media-queries.css
259 ms
css
25 ms
fontello.css
351 ms
light.css
358 ms
jquery.js
603 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
365 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
566 ms
slider.css
416 ms
slider-media-queries.css
439 ms
jquery.form.min.js
468 ms
scripts.js
387 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
452 ms
selectnav.js
467 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
474 ms
jquery.hoverdir.min.js
542 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
557 ms
twitter.min.js
547 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
553 ms
jquery.jribbble-0.11.0.ugly.js
579 ms
jquery.sharrre-1.3.3.php
1321 ms
retina.js
636 ms
scripts.js
712 ms
comment-reply.min.js
645 ms
style.php
1390 ms
css
14 ms
bg4.jpg
246 ms
testimage3.jpg
313 ms
testimage2.jpg
296 ms
burton_thumb.jpg
235 ms
02-logo_thumb.jpg
203 ms
dell_thumb.jpg
135 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
16 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
16 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
40 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
40 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
108 ms
line.png
231 ms
graph.facebook.com
215 ms
sharrre.php
453 ms
sharrre.php
475 ms
24 ms
timer.png
257 ms
loading.gif
222 ms
dropdown-arrow.png
257 ms
22 ms
~text
158 ms
coloredbg.png
102 ms
fontello.woff
298 ms
graciefolo.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
graciefolo.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
graciefolo.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graciefolo.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graciefolo.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
graciefolo.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graciefolo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: