1.5 sec in total
84 ms
1 sec
386 ms
Click here to check amazing Gradebeam content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gradebeam.com
Improve construction bid communication and connect with contractors.
Visit gradebeam.comWe analyzed Gradebeam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
gradebeam.com performance score
84 ms
62 ms
31 ms
97 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gradebeam.com, 78% (46 requests) were made to Www2.gradebeam.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (444 ms) relates to the external source Www2.gradebeam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 328.8 kB (24%)
1.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Gradebeam.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 963.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gradebeam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gradebeam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (48%)
54
28
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gradebeam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gradebeam.com
84 ms
www.gradebeam.com
62 ms
www2.gradebeam.com
31 ms
97 ms
font-awesome.min.css
6 ms
styles.css
42 ms
flexslider.css
50 ms
bootstrap.min.css
48 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
50 ms
dropdown.css
53 ms
css
68 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
61 ms
toplock.js
69 ms
dyniframe2.js
188 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
82 ms
libraries.js
83 ms
bootstrap.min.js
112 ms
dropdown.js
52 ms
selectors.js
115 ms
WebResource.axd
114 ms
print.css
16 ms
ga.js
93 ms
402313.js
144 ms
site-nav-back.gif
91 ms
visitor.gif
154 ms
logo-textura.png
42 ms
usa2.png
73 ms
aus2.png
37 ms
explornew.png
63 ms
logo-gradebeam.png
82 ms
top-sub-mo.gif
70 ms
sub.png
93 ms
GradeBeam-Banner-2.jpg
102 ms
Homepage%20-%20Header%203.jpg
120 ms
GB%20Header%20Image%202.jpg
444 ms
GradeBeam-Banner-1.jpg
137 ms
content_section_1-back.gif
132 ms
audiences-back.gif
145 ms
general-contractors-240x130.jpg
160 ms
subcontractors-240x130.jpg
160 ms
suppliers-240x130.jpg
169 ms
associations-240x130.jpg
191 ms
companies-connected.png
192 ms
project-opportunities.png
200 ms
messages-sent.png
203 ms
documents-viewed.png
215 ms
bigdata.jpg
233 ms
connect-communicate-construct-back.gif
240 ms
icon-connect.png
250 ms
icon-communicate.png
250 ms
icon-construct.png
268 ms
take-video-tour.png
278 ms
cpmfooterback.png
273 ms
icon-twitter.png
283 ms
4008.js
27 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
64 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__ptq.gif
14 ms
gradebeam.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gradebeam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gradebeam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gradebeam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gradebeam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: