Tools & Wizards About Us
graemeshaw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

graemeshaw.com

The Award Winning North East Magician Graeme Shaw Award-Winning Magic Of Graeme Shaw | Magician

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

graemeshaw.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to graemeshaw.com homepage info - get ready to check Graeme Shaw best content right away, or after learning these important things about graemeshaw.com

Award-Winning Magic Of Graeme Shaw. North East magician Graeme Shaw, an award-winning Newcastle magician performing close up magic and children`s magic.

Visit graemeshaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Graemeshaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graemeshaw.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

graemeshaw.com

56 ms

www.graemeshaw.com

1073 ms

style.css

168 ms

1600032546_custom_bg1.jpeg

183 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Graemeshaw.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Graemeshaw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

992.5 kB

After Optimization

860.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Graemeshaw.com main page is 992.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 636.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 50.0 kB
  • After minification 50.0 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 636.6 kB
  • After minification 617.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graeme Shaw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 267.9 kB
  • After minification 267.9 kB
  • After compression 216.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graemeshaw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (69%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graeme Shaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

graemeshaw.com

graemeshaw.com

56 ms

www.graemeshaw.com

www.graemeshaw.com

1073 ms

style.css

style.css

168 ms

1600032546_custom_bg1.jpeg

1600032546_custom_bg1.jpeg

183 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

wp-customer-reviews.css

181 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

259 ms

styles.css

styles.css

199 ms

html5reset.css

html5reset.css

199 ms

style.css

style.css

345 ms

skin.css

skin.css

351 ms

wp.css

wp.css

356 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

376 ms

media.css

media.css

377 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

validationEngine.jquery.css

435 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

545 ms

custom.css

custom.css

528 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

613 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

559 ms

wp-customer-reviews.js

wp-customer-reviews.js

557 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

621 ms

crimson.font.js

crimson.font.js

874 ms

load-cufon.js

load-cufon.js

738 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

735 ms

tumblog_frontend_styles.css

tumblog_frontend_styles.css

732 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

625 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

791 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

799 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

901 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1076 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

905 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

975 ms

index.js

index.js

992 ms

index.js

index.js

1043 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1112 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

1121 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

1176 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

1107 ms

api.js

api.js

32 ms

highslide-full.js

highslide-full.js

1216 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

highslide.config.js

highslide.config.js

1088 ms

highslide.mobile.js

highslide.mobile.js

1105 ms

jquery.transit.js

jquery.transit.js

1116 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

1103 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1156 ms

js

js

63 ms

index.js

index.js

1138 ms

1451215503_mobile_logo.png

1451215503_mobile_logo.png

552 ms

aside_t.png

aside_t.png

567 ms

aside_bg.png

aside_bg.png

596 ms

logo_bg.png

logo_bg.png

596 ms

thumb.php

thumb.php

936 ms

mm_spread.png

mm_spread.png

697 ms

ddmenu_bg.png

ddmenu_bg.png

729 ms

ddmenu_arr.png

ddmenu_arr.png

739 ms

ddmenu_b.png

ddmenu_b.png

767 ms

aside_b.png

aside_b.png

761 ms

bottom_bg.png

bottom_bg.png

789 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

896 ms

go_up.png

go_up.png

906 ms

custom.png

custom.png

189 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

184 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

175 ms

Accessibility Review

graemeshaw.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

graemeshaw.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

graemeshaw.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graemeshaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graemeshaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graemeshaw.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Graeme Shaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: