Tools & Wizards About Us
grahampackaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

grahampackaging.com

Graham Packaging Company | Sustainable Packaging For Your Market

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

grahampackaging.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Graham Packaging content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about grahampackaging.com

Through sound creative problem-solving and a dash of imagination, our global team of experts matches your products with innovative, sustainable plastic packaging solutions.

Visit grahampackaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Grahampackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

grahampackaging.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.001

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

grahampackaging.com

118 ms

www.grahampackaging.com

421 ms

gby8ett.css

430 ms

bootstrap.css

126 ms

style.css

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Grahampackaging.com, 24% (12 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 57.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

688.0 kB

After Optimization

630.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Grahampackaging.com main page is 688.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 410.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 67.7 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 410.7 kB
  • After minification 410.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graham Packaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 74.6 kB
  • After minification 74.6 kB
  • After compression 71.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 135.0 kB
  • After minification 135.0 kB
  • After compression 132.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grahampackaging.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graham Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

grahampackaging.com

grahampackaging.com

118 ms

www.grahampackaging.com

www.grahampackaging.com

421 ms

gby8ett.css

gby8ett.css

430 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

126 ms

style.css

style.css

260 ms

f2e99bcc0714d7d79f476702cfad3aa4d0966791.css

f2e99bcc0714d7d79f476702cfad3aa4d0966791.css

219 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

285 ms

api.js

api.js

370 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

296 ms

functions.js

functions.js

295 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

284 ms

fbc839ac5cfe0177a49a7eed85be9e3397120d44.js

fbc839ac5cfe0177a49a7eed85be9e3397120d44.js

284 ms

css

css

464 ms

css

css

480 ms

radio-checkbox.css

radio-checkbox.css

157 ms

animate.css

animate.css

158 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

163 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

165 ms

p.css

p.css

318 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

138 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

527 ms

fullwidth-callout-bg-green@2x.png

fullwidth-callout-bg-green@2x.png

317 ms

Markets-bg@2x.png

Markets-bg@2x.png

324 ms

bg_contact-banner.png

bg_contact-banner.png

308 ms

say_hello.svg

say_hello.svg

309 ms

footer-bg@2x.png

footer-bg@2x.png

313 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

893 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1093 ms

hotjar-1508069.js

hotjar-1508069.js

890 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

882 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

352 ms

d

d

248 ms

d

d

249 ms

d

d

249 ms

d

d

434 ms

d

d

435 ms

d

d

434 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

575 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

576 ms

d

d

432 ms

d

d

432 ms

d

d

432 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

247 ms

d

d

574 ms

d

d

574 ms

modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js

modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js

521 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

478 ms

collect

collect

148 ms

visit-data

visit-data

426 ms

42 ms

Accessibility Review

grahampackaging.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

grahampackaging.com best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

grahampackaging.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grahampackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grahampackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grahampackaging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graham Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: