Tools & Wizards About Us
grandjunctiontreeservices.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

grandjunctiontreeservices.com

Tree Removal in Grand Junction! - Grand Junction Tree Removal Specialists

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

211 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

133 ms

grandjunctiontreeservices.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Grand Junction Tree Services content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about grandjunctiontreeservices.com

Grand Junction Tree Services offers free estimates on tree trimming, tree removal, stump removal, and stump grinding in Grand Junction and the surrounding area.

Visit grandjunctiontreeservices.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Grandjunctiontreeservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 211 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

grandjunctiontreeservices.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.grandjunctiontreeservices.com

211 ms

css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

33 ms

style.min.css

68 ms

leaflet.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Grandjunctiontreeservices.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (381 ms) relates to the external source Reputationdatabase.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

944.4 kB

After Optimization

781.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Grandjunctiontreeservices.com main page is 944.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 689.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 40.7 kB

  • Original 53.9 kB
  • After minification 52.0 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 153.7 kB
  • After minification 129.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Grand Junction Tree Services needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 93.5 kB

  • Original 689.8 kB
  • After minification 689.8 kB
  • After compression 596.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 43.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grandjunctiontreeservices.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (74%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grand Junction Tree Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.grandjunctiontreeservices.com

www.grandjunctiontreeservices.com

211 ms

css

css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

68 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

38 ms

mappress.css

mappress.css

94 ms

styles.css

styles.css

96 ms

jrblog-styles.css

jrblog-styles.css

124 ms

css

css

65 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

116 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

95 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

96 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

148 ms

in.js

in.js

28 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

195 ms

index.js

index.js

193 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

193 ms

api.js

api.js

63 ms

index.js

index.js

193 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

218 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

26 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

159 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

124 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

all.js

all.js

85 ms

RK-8698-9167-241

RK-8698-9167-241

381 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

61 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

50 ms

Webp.net-resizeimage-1.png

Webp.net-resizeimage-1.png

109 ms

download1.png

download1.png

108 ms

downloadCA02G6UH-300x225.jpg

downloadCA02G6UH-300x225.jpg

108 ms

downloadCA5MZ8RT-300x225.jpg

downloadCA5MZ8RT-300x225.jpg

108 ms

621003480.png

621003480.png

61 ms

bg_banner.png

bg_banner.png

257 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

105 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

107 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

109 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

106 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

106 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

131 ms

all.js

all.js

13 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

8 ms

RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN9XFiaE.ttf

RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN9XFiaE.ttf

33 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

41 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

78 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

31 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

24 ms

settings

settings

187 ms

Accessibility Review

grandjunctiontreeservices.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

grandjunctiontreeservices.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

grandjunctiontreeservices.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grandjunctiontreeservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grandjunctiontreeservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grandjunctiontreeservices.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Grand Junction Tree Services. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: