Tools & Wizards About Us
granitecard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

granitecard.com

Credit Cards for People with Bad Credit - Compare deals with TotallyMoney

Page Load Speed

32.2 sec in total

First Response

778 ms

Resources Loaded

23 sec

Page Rendered

8.5 sec

granitecard.com screenshot

About Website

Visit granitecard.com now to see the best up-to-date Granitecard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about granitecard.com

Searching for a Bad Credit Credit Card? - We’ve Helped 1000s Get Credit. Up To £1600 Credit Limit and High Approval - Apply Now!

Visit granitecard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Granitecard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 778 ms and then it took 31.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

granitecard.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value29,910 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.173

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

778 ms

style.css

360 ms

buenos-aires2.css

257 ms

css2

293 ms

bootstrap.js

1606 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Granitecard.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Tr.snapchat.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Tag4arm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 463.1 kB (65%)

Content Size

716.8 kB

After Optimization

253.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Granitecard.com main page is 716.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 539.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 462.4 kB

  • Original 539.9 kB
  • After minification 539.5 kB
  • After compression 77.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 462.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Granitecard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 410 B

  • Original 98.3 kB
  • After minification 98.3 kB
  • After compression 97.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 482 B
  • After minification 341 B
  • After compression 184 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Granitecard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 298 B or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (67%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Granitecard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

778 ms

style.css

style.css

360 ms

buenos-aires2.css

buenos-aires2.css

257 ms

css2

css2

293 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1606 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

1337 ms

creditcards-hero.png

creditcards-hero.png

1200 ms

background-image-large.jpg

background-image-large.jpg

1161 ms

BuenosAires-SemiBold.woff

BuenosAires-SemiBold.woff

64 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshRTM.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshRTM.ttf

804 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmRTM.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmRTM.ttf

768 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

258 ms

bat.js

bat.js

1499 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

1460 ms

core.js

core.js

1455 ms

scevent.min.js

scevent.min.js

1624 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

1623 ms

115861.ct.js

115861.ct.js

1619 ms

websdk.appsflyer.com

websdk.appsflyer.com

2234 ms

events.js

events.js

2234 ms

js

js

186 ms

js

js

665 ms

tag4arm.js

tag4arm.js

2351 ms

collect

collect

323 ms

collect

collect

1861 ms

collect

collect

1948 ms

js

js

996 ms

collect

collect

970 ms

main.3a217bc7.js

main.3a217bc7.js

776 ms

rp.gif

rp.gif

1067 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

650 ms

452225391579194

452225391579194

211 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

601 ms

i

i

376 ms

is_enabled

is_enabled

473 ms

400333684124306

400333684124306

212 ms

tag4arm.php

tag4arm.php

473 ms

tag4armcheck.php

tag4armcheck.php

498 ms

370 ms

p

p

265 ms

p

p

276 ms

458 ms

90 ms

Accessibility Review

granitecard.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

granitecard.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

granitecard.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Granitecard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Granitecard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

granitecard.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Granitecard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: