Tools & Wizards About Us
graphicalprint.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

graphicalprint.com

Wide Format Printing | GraphicalPrint | United States

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

graphicalprint.com screenshot

About Website

Visit graphicalprint.com now to see the best up-to-date Graphical Print content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about graphicalprint.com

Quick, Easy & Fast. We are equipped with the latest printers and cutters, allowing us to offer a large quantity of materials, durability &; sizes. Think big, make it yours, expand your product today w...

Visit graphicalprint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphicalprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphicalprint.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.graphicalprint.com

100 ms

minified.js

39 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

38 ms

polyfill.min.js

849 ms

thunderbolt-commons.40a6e213.bundle.min.js

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Graphicalprint.com, 42% (23 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 31% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (934 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 529.8 kB (41%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

753.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Graphicalprint.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 481.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 286.8 kB

  • Original 371.1 kB
  • After minification 369.4 kB
  • After compression 84.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 431.0 kB
  • After minification 419.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphical Print images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 231.4 kB

  • Original 481.4 kB
  • After minification 481.4 kB
  • After compression 250.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.4 kB or 48% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (23%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphical Print. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.graphicalprint.com

www.graphicalprint.com

100 ms

minified.js

minified.js

39 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

38 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

849 ms

thunderbolt-commons.40a6e213.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.40a6e213.bundle.min.js

72 ms

main.c2d7b664.bundle.min.js

main.c2d7b664.bundle.min.js

74 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

72 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

73 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

72 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

74 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

73 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

74 ms

graphicalprint%202.png

graphicalprint%202.png

291 ms

0553b4_6359ed4f696043f1865f02a62bc56cf8~mv2.jpg

0553b4_6359ed4f696043f1865f02a62bc56cf8~mv2.jpg

374 ms

0553b4_db2f60ee7b07495ebe1e290e71dd9345~mv2.png

0553b4_db2f60ee7b07495ebe1e290e71dd9345~mv2.png

388 ms

Laser_icon.png

Laser_icon.png

404 ms

Large_format%20icon.png

Large_format%20icon.png

399 ms

installation_icon.png

installation_icon.png

442 ms

0553b4_3058cf2a789c455581910707e5b87fda~mv2.jpg

0553b4_3058cf2a789c455581910707e5b87fda~mv2.jpg

533 ms

0553b4_ff0d4c5678e444eb89e6cd67db7fcdad~mv2.jpg

0553b4_ff0d4c5678e444eb89e6cd67db7fcdad~mv2.jpg

471 ms

0553b4_49d5cc56c1514e94a4e22b8e5b7975b5~mv2.jpg

0553b4_49d5cc56c1514e94a4e22b8e5b7975b5~mv2.jpg

652 ms

0553b4_ae15ed536e714b90867a722c63bd8df0~mv2.jpg

0553b4_ae15ed536e714b90867a722c63bd8df0~mv2.jpg

700 ms

0553b4_c1e9ea17bbcc41f4b79b5f8538b892cc~mv2.jpg

0553b4_c1e9ea17bbcc41f4b79b5f8538b892cc~mv2.jpg

619 ms

0553b4_027ae4f05def45bcbcb14d2c04d6f9a2~mv2.jpg

0553b4_027ae4f05def45bcbcb14d2c04d6f9a2~mv2.jpg

645 ms

0553b4_536593601fae40bd9808af8d7e0d77ea~mv2.jpg

0553b4_536593601fae40bd9808af8d7e0d77ea~mv2.jpg

688 ms

0553b4_8eec5070126b46dd9c2a00a67ce9cd50~mv2.jpg

0553b4_8eec5070126b46dd9c2a00a67ce9cd50~mv2.jpg

757 ms

0553b4_ca9f7968dc7f420f87fb9ab6299ec2c2f000.jpg

0553b4_ca9f7968dc7f420f87fb9ab6299ec2c2f000.jpg

934 ms

Phone.png

Phone.png

873 ms

035244_d689ceddf4ed40e1b2122bab3a5e38fc~mv2.png

035244_d689ceddf4ed40e1b2122bab3a5e38fc~mv2.png

653 ms

035244_d8e2397534c24db1a7e7a10991d73ccc~mv2.png

035244_d8e2397534c24db1a7e7a10991d73ccc~mv2.png

655 ms

035244_6f75c90bfd8b4f9eac84808fe7afcc92~mv2.png

035244_6f75c90bfd8b4f9eac84808fe7afcc92~mv2.png

657 ms

035244_7a6c06171f9a414baf5c990ce9f840ad~mv2.png

035244_7a6c06171f9a414baf5c990ce9f840ad~mv2.png

658 ms

035244_e6828d11d0ef465a8c1b263e4c31d602~mv2.png

035244_e6828d11d0ef465a8c1b263e4c31d602~mv2.png

659 ms

035244_6d553d072d074906921789d726bc57ca~mv2.png

035244_6d553d072d074906921789d726bc57ca~mv2.png

662 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

43 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

40 ms

file.woff

file.woff

552 ms

97 ms

104 ms

106 ms

101 ms

98 ms

96 ms

144 ms

138 ms

142 ms

137 ms

143 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

17 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

graphicalprint.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Best Practices

graphicalprint.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

graphicalprint.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicalprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicalprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graphicalprint.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Graphical Print. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: