Tools & Wizards About Us
graphicconservation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

graphicconservation.com

Home - Graphic Conservation Company

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

333 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

193 ms

graphicconservation.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Graphic Conservation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about graphicconservation.com

We are art conservators specializing in the preservation and conservation of works of art on paper and parchment.

Visit graphicconservation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphicconservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphicconservation.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.graphicconservation.com

333 ms

preset.css

52 ms

960.css

82 ms

style.css

82 ms

js

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Graphicconservation.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Rw1.marchex.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) belongs to the original domain Graphicconservation.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 329.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

10.2 MB

After Optimization

9.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Graphicconservation.com main page is 10.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 78.5 kB
  • After minification 72.3 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 255.8 kB

  • Original 9.8 MB
  • After minification 9.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphic Conservation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 300.6 kB
  • After minification 300.0 kB
  • After compression 294.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graphicconservation.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (34%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

57

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphic Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.graphicconservation.com

www.graphicconservation.com

333 ms

preset.css

preset.css

52 ms

960.css

960.css

82 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

js

js

57 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

104 ms

styles.css

styles.css

106 ms

style.css

style.css

102 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

109 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

116 ms

jquery.slider.js

jquery.slider.js

119 ms

jquery.textfill.js

jquery.textfill.js

118 ms

home.js

home.js

119 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

120 ms

zl-multine-files.js

zl-multine-files.js

138 ms

jquery.retina.js

jquery.retina.js

140 ms

global.js

global.js

137 ms

external-links.js

external-links.js

141 ms

smooth.scroll.js

smooth.scroll.js

145 ms

js

js

59 ms

number-changer.js

number-changer.js

22 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

148 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

158 ms

index.js

index.js

150 ms

index.js

index.js

156 ms

api.js

api.js

34 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

159 ms

index.js

index.js

158 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

36 ms

core.js

core.js

36 ms

logo02.png

logo02.png

239 ms

getnumdata.js

getnumdata.js

17 ms

header-bg.png

header-bg.png

94 ms

restoration-bg.png

restoration-bg.png

94 ms

restoration-separator.png

restoration-separator.png

94 ms

Marriage-License-01_0.png

Marriage-License-01_0.png

145 ms

Marriage-License-02_0.png

Marriage-License-02_0.png

198 ms

Marriage-License-03.png

Marriage-License-03.png

200 ms

Marriage-License-04.png

Marriage-License-04.png

216 ms

Marriage-License-05.png

Marriage-License-05.png

236 ms

stages-bg.png

stages-bg.png

144 ms

Diploma-01_0.png

Diploma-01_0.png

260 ms

Diploma-02_0.png

Diploma-02_0.png

232 ms

Diploma-03_0.png

Diploma-03_0.png

235 ms

Diploma-04_0.png

Diploma-04_0.png

240 ms

Diploma-05_0.png

Diploma-05_0.png

254 ms

Toulouse-01.png

Toulouse-01.png

279 ms

Toulouse-02.png

Toulouse-02.png

276 ms

Toulouse-03.png

Toulouse-03.png

276 ms

Toulouse-04.png

Toulouse-04.png

276 ms

Toulouse-05.png

Toulouse-05.png

291 ms

Vellum-Doc-01_0.png

Vellum-Doc-01_0.png

289 ms

Vellum-Doc-02_0.png

Vellum-Doc-02_0.png

313 ms

Vellum-Doc-03.png

Vellum-Doc-03.png

313 ms

Vellum-Doc-04.png

Vellum-Doc-04.png

320 ms

13th-Amendment-01.png

13th-Amendment-01.png

328 ms

Thirteenth-signature_1.png

Thirteenth-signature_1.png

328 ms

13th-Amendment-02_0.png

13th-Amendment-02_0.png

335 ms

Gehrig-Photo-01.png

Gehrig-Photo-01.png

355 ms

Gehrig-Photo-02.png

Gehrig-Photo-02.png

357 ms

Gehrig-Photo-03.png

Gehrig-Photo-03.png

362 ms

Gehrig-Photo-04.png

Gehrig-Photo-04.png

363 ms

Gehrig-Photo-05.png

Gehrig-Photo-05.png

357 ms

Lincoln-Painting-01.png

Lincoln-Painting-01.png

343 ms

Lincoln-Painting-02.png

Lincoln-Painting-02.png

369 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

77 ms

Lincoln-Painting-03.png

Lincoln-Painting-03.png

367 ms

Lincoln-Painting-04.png

Lincoln-Painting-04.png

372 ms

Lincoln-Painting-05.png

Lincoln-Painting-05.png

375 ms

Elvis-Hat-01.png

Elvis-Hat-01.png

309 ms

Elvis-Hat-02.png

Elvis-Hat-02.png

316 ms

Elvis-Hat-03.png

Elvis-Hat-03.png

330 ms

Elvis-Hat-04.png

Elvis-Hat-04.png

283 ms

Elvis-Hat-05.png

Elvis-Hat-05.png

289 ms

prev.png

prev.png

230 ms

next.png

next.png

231 ms

slider-nav.png

slider-nav.png

225 ms

home-paper-tool.png

home-paper-tool.png

231 ms

no-image-broken.png

no-image-broken.png

221 ms

rule.png

rule.png

220 ms

aic-logo.png

aic-logo.png

217 ms

home-paper-hand.png

home-paper-hand.png

215 ms

filigree.png

filigree.png

205 ms

location.png

location.png

207 ms

001-facebook.png

001-facebook.png

209 ms

002-instagram.png

002-instagram.png

207 ms

003-linkedin.png

003-linkedin.png

211 ms

Accessibility Review

graphicconservation.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

graphicconservation.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

graphicconservation.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicconservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicconservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graphicconservation.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Graphic Conservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: