Tools & Wizards About Us
gravity.video screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

gravity.video

Gravity.Video | Versatile, affordable video solutions.

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

931 ms

gravity.video screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gravity.video homepage info - get ready to check Gravity best content right away, or after learning these important things about gravity.video

Gravity.Video works with brands, agencies, and businesses to create high quality, affordable video solutions. Video editing, production, animation, and beyond.

Visit gravity.video

Key Findings

We analyzed Gravity.video page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gravity.video performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gravityvideo.org

1062 ms

webfont.js

32 ms

dj7mx.css

205 ms

dj7mx.js

305 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Gravity.video, 19% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (20%)

Content Size

10.1 MB

After Optimization

8.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gravity.video main page is 10.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

  • Original 116.1 kB
  • After minification 113.7 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 9.1 MB
  • After minification 7.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gravity needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 56.4 kB

  • Original 560.9 kB
  • After minification 560.9 kB
  • After compression 504.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 240.3 kB
  • After minification 240.3 kB
  • After compression 183.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gravity.video needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (18%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gravity. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gravityvideo.org

gravityvideo.org

1062 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

32 ms

dj7mx.css

dj7mx.css

205 ms

dj7mx.js

dj7mx.js

305 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

69 ms

js

js

117 ms

css

css

1085 ms

footer-dfc8c63b4ef484e6f7663a095dd2b3f04af8797e.min.js

footer-dfc8c63b4ef484e6f7663a095dd2b3f04af8797e.min.js

354 ms

api.js

api.js

75 ms

css

css

65 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

30 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

32 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

34 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

34 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

35 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

116 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

58 ms

gravity-video.png

gravity-video.png

180 ms

header_still.png

header_still.png

441 ms

production_bg_still.png

production_bg_still.png

222 ms

CTG.png

CTG.png

324 ms

gss-mash.png

gss-mash.png

356 ms

hague.png

hague.png

238 ms

bluesound.png

bluesound.png

434 ms

hart.png

hart.png

285 ms

boots.png

boots.png

319 ms

sundiyl.png

sundiyl.png

343 ms

mtn-state.png

mtn-state.png

388 ms

myfirstNADthumb.png

myfirstNADthumb.png

390 ms

trillium.png

trillium.png

389 ms

NCF.png

NCF.png

432 ms

peepers.png

peepers.png

455 ms

irem.png

irem.png

460 ms

groves-patient.png

groves-patient.png

449 ms

refined.png

refined.png

512 ms

wendys.png

wendys.png

512 ms

LMI.png

LMI.png

513 ms

brandabl.png

brandabl.png

510 ms

WA.png

WA.png

528 ms

vector_thumbnail.png

vector_thumbnail.png

509 ms

hutto.png

hutto.png

584 ms

mizuno.png

mizuno.png

589 ms

infinity.png

infinity.png

581 ms

STATSports.png

STATSports.png

582 ms

content-awards-sizzle.png

content-awards-sizzle.png

591 ms

benzinga-thumbnail.png

benzinga-thumbnail.png

602 ms

alameda.png

alameda.png

668 ms

ora-king.png

ora-king.png

666 ms

submit-spin.svg

submit-spin.svg

665 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

9 ms

aperture2.png

aperture2.png

580 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

4 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

21 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

22 ms

Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff

Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff

468 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

507 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

37 ms

Accessibility Review

gravity.video accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gravity.video best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gravity.video SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gravity.video can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gravity.video main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gravity.video

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gravity. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: