Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

greatwallhiking.com

Great Wall Hiking Specialist 2023. Leading operator for Great Wall tours in Beijing and surrounding area.

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

greatwallhiking.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to greatwallhiking.com homepage info - get ready to check Great Wall Hiking best content right away, or after learning these important things about greatwallhiking.com

Great Wall Hiking offers a variety of tours of hiking, trekking, walking and camping on the Great Wall around Beijing. Great Wall Hiking's commitment to a Western standard of service and responsible t...

Visit greatwallhiking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Greatwallhiking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

greatwallhiking.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.912

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

greatwallhiking.com

22 ms

www.greatwallhiking.com

387 ms

zsite-core.css

260 ms

style.css

271 ms

css

289 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Greatwallhiking.com, 19% (15 requests) were made to Static.zohocdn.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Greatwallhiking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 152.5 kB (41%)

Content Size

369.5 kB

After Optimization

217.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Greatwallhiking.com main page is 369.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 171.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 114.5 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 143.3 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 709 B

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Great Wall Hiking needs image optimization as it can save up to 709 B or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 171.3 kB
  • After minification 171.3 kB
  • After compression 170.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 37.0 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greatwallhiking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (30%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Great Wall Hiking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

greatwallhiking.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

greatwallhiking.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

greatwallhiking.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greatwallhiking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Greatwallhiking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Great Wall Hiking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: