Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

348 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

green-technology.org screenshot

About Website

Visit green-technology.org now to see the best up-to-date Green Technology content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about green-technology.org

Strategy and leadership for clean and sustainable communities.

Visit green-technology.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Green-technology.org page load time and found that the first response time was 348 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

green-technology.org performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

green-technology.org

348 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

471 ms

jquery.ui.core.min.css

142 ms

jquery.ui.theme.min.css

212 ms

addthis_widget.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Green-technology.org, 7% (8 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Green-technology.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 707.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

887.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Green-technology.org main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 741.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 162.0 kB

  • Original 211.6 kB
  • After minification 209.8 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 627.7 kB
  • After minification 585.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Green Technology images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 491.4 kB

  • Original 741.1 kB
  • After minification 741.1 kB
  • After compression 249.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 491.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Green-technology.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 92 (80%)

Requests Now

115

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Green Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

green-technology.org accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

green-technology.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

green-technology.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Green-technology.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Green-technology.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Green Technology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: