Tools & Wizards About Us
greenbay.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

greenbay.digital

Green Bay Digital - Website Design Green Bay Wisconsin

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

83 ms

Resources Loaded

804 ms

Page Rendered

610 ms

greenbay.digital screenshot

About Website

Welcome to greenbay.digital homepage info - get ready to check Green Bay best content right away, or after learning these important things about greenbay.digital

Green Bay Digital offers web design services for small business, organizations, and individuals. Located in Green Bay, Wisconsin, we specialize in creating visually appealing and functional websites t...

Visit greenbay.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Greenbay.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

greenbay.digital performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

greenbay.digital

83 ms

greenbay.digital

42 ms

500 ms

css

49 ms

dashicons.min.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Greenbay.digital, 25% (8 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 251.4 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

838.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Greenbay.digital main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 612.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 223.9 kB

  • Original 267.9 kB
  • After minification 264.1 kB
  • After compression 44.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 612.2 kB
  • After minification 610.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Green Bay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 173.6 kB
  • After minification 173.6 kB
  • After compression 148.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 881 B

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 36.6 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greenbay.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (50%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Green Bay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

greenbay.digital

greenbay.digital

83 ms

greenbay.digital

greenbay.digital

42 ms

500 ms

css

css

49 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

182 ms

jacketsnyc-macbook.jpg

jacketsnyc-macbook.jpg

403 ms

171 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

73 ms

251 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

116 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

224 ms

js

js

138 ms

470 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

213 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

305 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

262 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

270 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

426 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

39 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

432 ms

gb-digital-900-220x80.png

gb-digital-900-220x80.png

396 ms

gb-digital-white.png

gb-digital-white.png

358 ms

hrc-macbook.jpg

hrc-macbook.jpg

614 ms

bridalgowns-macbook.jpg

bridalgowns-macbook.jpg

392 ms

cutarug-macbook.jpg

cutarug-macbook.jpg

452 ms

jane-wilson-marquis-bwhite-735x1024-1.jpeg

jane-wilson-marquis-bwhite-735x1024-1.jpeg

60 ms

4v9kk01meby.jpg

4v9kk01meby.jpg

155 ms

tzc3vjpck-q.jpg

tzc3vjpck-q.jpg

162 ms

ssl-certification.jpg

ssl-certification.jpg

247 ms

green-bay-wisconsin-1.jpg

green-bay-wisconsin-1.jpg

90 ms

font

font

30 ms

font

font

42 ms

Accessibility Review

greenbay.digital accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

greenbay.digital best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

greenbay.digital SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greenbay.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Greenbay.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

greenbay.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Green Bay. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: