Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

greenfieldpaper.com

Greenfield Plantable / Recycled Seed Paper and Cards

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

727 ms

Page Rendered

169 ms

greenfieldpaper.com screenshot

About Website

Visit greenfieldpaper.com now to see the best up-to-date Greenfield Paper content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about greenfieldpaper.com

858-565-2585 | With our roots established in sustainability, Green Field Paper Company has crafted plantable / recycled seed paper & cards with a purpose since 1992.

Visit greenfieldpaper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Greenfieldpaper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 896 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

greenfieldpaper.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,110 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.223

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

greenfieldpaper.com

126 ms

www.greenfieldpaper.com

179 ms

stylesheet.css

77 ms

blog.png

127 ms

seal.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Greenfieldpaper.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (337 ms) belongs to the original domain Greenfieldpaper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

491.0 kB

After Optimization

426.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Greenfieldpaper.com main page is 491.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 433.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

  • Original 433.2 kB
  • After minification 396.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Greenfield Paper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 259 B

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greenfieldpaper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Greenfield Paper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

greenfieldpaper.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

greenfieldpaper.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

greenfieldpaper.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greenfieldpaper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Greenfieldpaper.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Greenfield Paper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: