Tools & Wizards About Us
greenmarkenvironmental.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

greenmarkenvironmental.com

Landscaping in Rosenberg and Fulshear, TX | GreenMark Environmental

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

547 ms

greenmarkenvironmental.com screenshot

About Website

Visit greenmarkenvironmental.com now to see the best up-to-date Green Mark Environmental content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about greenmarkenvironmental.com

Here at Greenmark Environmental we strive to provide superior quality services to help homeowners with their landscaping needs.

Visit greenmarkenvironmental.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Greenmarkenvironmental.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

greenmarkenvironmental.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

greenmarkenvironmental.com

111 ms

greenmarkenvironmental.com

472 ms

style.min.css

47 ms

normalize.min.css

19 ms

foundation.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Greenmarkenvironmental.com, 25% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (472 ms) belongs to the original domain Greenmarkenvironmental.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Greenmarkenvironmental.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 80.6 kB

  • Original 100.7 kB
  • After minification 96.6 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Green Mark Environmental images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 93.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 752 B

  • Original 38.8 kB
  • After minification 38.8 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greenmarkenvironmental.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (48%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Green Mark Environmental. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

greenmarkenvironmental.com

greenmarkenvironmental.com

111 ms

greenmarkenvironmental.com

greenmarkenvironmental.com

472 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

19 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

45 ms

slick.css

slick.css

50 ms

page-css.php

page-css.php

300 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

71 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

55 ms

foundation.topbar.js

foundation.topbar.js

52 ms

f9c8f97a41.js

f9c8f97a41.js

141 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

60 ms

js

js

88 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

34 ms

jquery.datetimepicker.css

jquery.datetimepicker.css

43 ms

cookie-js.min.js

cookie-js.min.js

43 ms

lnm-scripts.min.js

lnm-scripts.min.js

49 ms

slick.js

slick.js

60 ms

foundation.equalizer.js

foundation.equalizer.js

60 ms

compiled.js

compiled.js

59 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

css

css

29 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

81 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

83 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

157 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

154 ms

linknow-logo-black.png

linknow-logo-black.png

184 ms

fq.png

fq.png

51 ms

wg.png

wg.png

51 ms

sg.png

sg.png

51 ms

review-w.png

review-w.png

50 ms

home-img1.jpg

home-img1.jpg

124 ms

home-img2.jpg

home-img2.jpg

121 ms

get_captcha.php

get_captcha.php

122 ms

refresh.png

refresh.png

123 ms

home1.jpg

home1.jpg

79 ms

bigleaf.png

bigleaf.png

78 ms

smallleaf.png

smallleaf.png

79 ms

home2.jpg

home2.jpg

80 ms

home-img3.jpg

home-img3.jpg

135 ms

bottom-bg.jpg

bottom-bg.jpg

80 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjd5a7dvg.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjd5a7dvg.ttf

56 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjd1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjd1ak.ttf

64 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPErd1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPErd1ak.ttf

100 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPCbd1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPCbd1ak.ttf

110 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPPjd1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPPjd1ak.ttf

109 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjc1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjc1ak.ttf

109 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPKba1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPKba1ak.ttf

110 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPJ_a1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPJ_a1ak.ttf

112 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPPja1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPPja1ak.ttf

111 ms

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPNHa1ak.ttf

o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPNHa1ak.ttf

111 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

163 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvDFR.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvDFR.ttf

165 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt65qV.ttf

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt65qV.ttf

166 ms

6xKpdSJbL9-e9LuoeQiDRQR8WOXaPw.ttf

6xKpdSJbL9-e9LuoeQiDRQR8WOXaPw.ttf

212 ms

6xKpdSJbL9-e9LuoeQiDRQR8aOI.ttf

6xKpdSJbL9-e9LuoeQiDRQR8aOI.ttf

166 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

47 ms

aem.js

aem.js

39 ms

Accessibility Review

greenmarkenvironmental.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

greenmarkenvironmental.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

greenmarkenvironmental.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greenmarkenvironmental.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Greenmarkenvironmental.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

greenmarkenvironmental.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Green Mark Environmental. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: