Tools & Wizards About Us
greenpack.ir screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

greenpack.ir

ساک دستی |چاپ ساک دستی |ساک دستی تبلیغاتی |ساک دستی کاغذی |ساک دستی پارچه ای

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

583 ms

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

811 ms

greenpack.ir screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Greenpack content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about greenpack.ir

مجموعه گرین پک با بیش از چندین سال تجربه در تولید و چاپ ساک دستی با کادری مجرب و حرفه ای آماده خدمت رسانی به شما مشتری گرامی می باشد .

Visit greenpack.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Greenpack.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 583 ms and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

greenpack.ir performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value39.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.214

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

greenpack.ir

583 ms

higreenplus.com

2100 ms

analytics.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

569 ms

sorenMain.min.css

933 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Greenpack.ir, 87% (34 requests) were made to Higreenplus.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Higreenplus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.9 kB (1%)

Content Size

12.5 MB

After Optimization

12.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Greenpack.ir main page is 12.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 94.8 kB

  • Original 109.8 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.6 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 12.3 MB
  • After minification 12.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Greenpack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 118.0 kB
  • After minification 118.0 kB
  • After compression 118.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 210 B

  • Original 52.7 kB
  • After minification 52.7 kB
  • After compression 52.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greenpack.ir has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Greenpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

greenpack.ir

greenpack.ir

583 ms

higreenplus.com

higreenplus.com

2100 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

569 ms

sorenMain.min.css

sorenMain.min.css

933 ms

iranyekan.css

iranyekan.css

560 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

js

js

54 ms

sorenMain.min.js

sorenMain.min.js

1207 ms

Gudijat5.jpg

Gudijat5.jpg

194 ms

loading-1.gif

loading-1.gif

187 ms

time.png

time.png

185 ms

design.png

design.png

367 ms

garanty.png

garanty.png

372 ms

qualit.png

qualit.png

385 ms

delivery.png

delivery.png

549 ms

support.png

support.png

558 ms

BG.png

BG.png

2023 ms

aboutBack.jpg

aboutBack.jpg

1337 ms

Xi4PkBes.jpg

Xi4PkBes.jpg

1937 ms

carusel.jpg

carusel.jpg

627 ms

02ZX9Wxu.jpg

02ZX9Wxu.jpg

2006 ms

VOvkdofW.jpg

VOvkdofW.jpg

929 ms

r8fgzJ4n.jpg

r8fgzJ4n.jpg

2170 ms

hRuzaZw1.jpg

hRuzaZw1.jpg

2228 ms

E5awpKSM.jpg

E5awpKSM.jpg

1528 ms

83msuyBt.jpg

83msuyBt.jpg

2106 ms

2odzncST.jpg

2odzncST.jpg

2128 ms

jWT16Fie.webp

jWT16Fie.webp

2189 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

2206 ms

iranyekanwebbold.ttf

iranyekanwebbold.ttf

2185 ms

iranyekanwebregular.ttf

iranyekanwebregular.ttf

2225 ms

iranyekanweblight.ttf

iranyekanweblight.ttf

2260 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

2261 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

2289 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

2310 ms

flaticon.svg

flaticon.svg

2375 ms

flaticon.ttf

flaticon.ttf

2398 ms

Accessibility Review

greenpack.ir accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

greenpack.ir best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

greenpack.ir SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greenpack.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Persian. Our system also found out that Greenpack.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

greenpack.ir

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Greenpack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: